Re: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bis

"庞冉(联通集团中国联通研究院-本 部)" <> Mon, 18 April 2022 02:28 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F273A0E64 for <>; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 19:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jQsLP64kJozD for <>; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 19:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3D43A0E67 for <>; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 19:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 0a000f34-b99be70000001d7e-5e-625cccc4f9ae
Received: from M10-HQ-MLCEN03.cnc.intra (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 16.AB.07550.4CCCC526; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:28:20 +0800 (HKT)
Received: from M10-HQ-ML12.hq.cnc.intra ( by M10-HQ-MLCEN03.cnc.intra ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.32; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:28:20 +0800
Received: from M10-HQ-ML02.hq.cnc.intra ( by M10-HQ-ML12.hq.cnc.intra ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.32; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:28:16 +0800
Received: from M10-HQ-ML02.hq.cnc.intra ([fe80::4ca7:7071:a80c:2566]) by M10-HQ-ML02.hq.cnc.intra ([fe80::4ca7:7071:a80c:2566%19]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.033; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:28:16 +0800
From: "庞冉(联通集团中国联通研究院-本 部)" <>
To: Tommy Pauly <>, IETF IPPM WG <>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bis
Thread-Index: AQHYUsvSs0RIjJFuOE6qpDk1Y/o8JA==
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 02:28:16 +0000
Message-ID: <61a9084dc13f429894b7985e2811abc1@M10-HQ-ML02.hq.cnc.intra>
References: <>, <>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_61a9084dc13f429894b7985e2811abc1M10HQML02hqcncintra_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrCIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXC9fOKou6RMzFJBjuPslv0PHjHbNEz6RWz A5PHiWVXWD2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJWx+Z9swYa6ijlnjzM1MP6p6mLk5JAQMJG4 MeU6cxcjF4eQwHlGiRnLWqCcnYwSayYcQnDun14E5RxmlNi5uJUdpJ9NoE5i5d0vjCC2iECw RM/VK2wgtrCAvcSEb2eZIOIOEsf33GeBsPUkGs9/BOtlEVCVaPl4DWgoBwevgLvExgteEPNb GCVWPF8INpNRQFZi2qP7YHOYBcQl5k6bxQpxt4DEkj3nmSFsUYmXj/9BxQ0kti7dxwJhK0gs 77nHCNGbLXH48B6wel4BQYmTM5+A1QgJKEs0H5/OOoFRbBaSFbOQtMxC0jIL6FRmAU2J9bv0 IUoUJaZ0P2SHsDUkWufMZUcWX8DIvopRMtjX3cLYwkDX30gvOSMzL7E0LzM5P1cvOW8TIygi GfhNdjDeu/VB7xAjEwfjIUYJDmYlEd6eJdFJQrwpiZVVqUX58UWlOanFhxilOViUxHntmw2T hATSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLJMHJxSDUy7lKcU3FWZ/8jj+yWm6v8v1yoUssSdfB/t0bLmzdcptcql Id9OO3+b4NrV46279mTIrhm1k8seT755Kqi8kXvz2avbjPU3Zd6tFfHjfqKgxn7cTmaCwHvd t7UPn2kz2K48crwn4xuz38NDU5M/dmg0v24V+NT1+/K2TTscf7vatzM5Br47MDNR5c2XSQWn FvnZ/ruwwvL5432OBam6Nevyd22YeXH1mreaBan9msIXzj/uPJfl7Ml68mnT/PiHS++uFXC/ GrTrbkKBrsijLVp8N5yj7v3MrLDfu+ap5hSuhJX31TpXx3LtOHQ19IJ3gK73rOsnLSYd5+b/ cfjKbY4FF3pe2XQvK4tws4vZXtoVrcRSnJFoqMVcVJwIANq/Two3AwAA
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bis
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 02:28:30 -0000

Hi WG,

I support the adoption of the two drafts.

Best regards,
Pang Ran.

From: Tommy Pauly<>
Date: 2022-04-08 08:03
Subject: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bis
Hello IPPM,

This email starts an adoption call for draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis and draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis. Please see Martin’s emails below for details — the main idea here is that we’re moving two IPPM RFCs from Experimental to Proposed Standard.

The chairs would like to have a short amount of time spent in the WG processing these documents. If we adopt, we’d plan to very shortly thereafter do a working group last call.

Please reply to this email by Thursday, April 21 and indicate if you support adopting this document.

Tommy & Marcus

On Apr 7, 2022, at 1:16 PM, Martin Duke <<>> wrote:

Hello IPPM,

You may recall that there was a need to progress RFC8321 and RFC8889 from Experimental to Proposed Standard. There was a feeling that the update would be trivial and we could therefore do it as an AD sponsored document.

I've done 3 rounds of AD review and I've seen the need to substantially adjust the scope of these documents and tweak the design in places. The changes are not revolutionary, but I'm a non-practitioner and have driven some design changes with minimal review. At this point I think it's important to get good IPPM review; if we're going to do that anyway, we might as well do the (expedited) working group process so that there's no confusion as to why IPPM didn't formally review an update to its own documents.

So, as first step, I invite the working group to adopt these two drafts:
Any objections to adoption, as always, should be to the value of doing the work at all, and the general direction of the drafts. I hope to follow up the adoption call with an immediate WGLC to shake out any detailed objections, though we will take as long as we need to address concerns that people have.

I invite you to consult the changelogs on both of these documents, which are not long, to get a sense of what we've done.

For those of you who like diffs, there was a big reorganization between draft-02 and -03 that is hard to follow in a diff. So here is a set of diffs that exclude the -02 to -03 transition:

I believe it's up to the chairs to start the adoption call. If people are good about reading the document during WGLC, I would like to think we could be done before IETF 114.

Your friendly Area Director,

ippm mailing list<>

如果您错误接收了该邮件,请通过电子邮件立即通知我们。请回复邮件到,即可以退订此邮件。我们将立即将您的信息从我们的发送目录中删除。 If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately by e-mail. Please reply to ,you can unsubscribe from this mail. We will immediately remove your information from send catalogue of our.