Re: [ippm] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data

"Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <fbrockne@cisco.com> Thu, 06 February 2020 11:08 UTC

Return-Path: <fbrockne@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F011202DD for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 03:08:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=CoXBIo87; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=opt7zmA2
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zBCv8CBIuc0t for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 03:08:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5971B12025D for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 03:08:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16530; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1580987321; x=1582196921; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Oo5Agv2oB2n6Jb1iAaIbUrPjpCSCCrBMzm8Az8ysOWs=; b=CoXBIo87adqEXc8xKyGxETlBGZOztedzQ7hucF5pthRSNujHq4JbAPlf BB/EhrgMXhu08ZiR1Jfi3IMBkUvBYITJayFZY2Rq2riDiNGhv//SQZj1o ZGnlLdx2ZdCBhb8zySR5FiTNVOmvLed2c6ZVwsZqAvp6mExD7yeKJ6aiV Y=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:WxO9Vx0hLBFyi91VsmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxKGt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8RVgOIdJSwdDjMwXmwI6B8vQB0fhK/XpaSESF8VZX1gj9Ha+YgBY
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A0AgB08jte/4kNJK1mHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgWoEAQELAYEkLyQsBWxYIAQLKgqHUQOKf4JfkzCEYoFCgRADVAkBAQEMAQEYAQoKAgEBhEACgjwkNwYOAgMNAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFZgEBAQEDAQEQCxATAQEsCwEPAgEIEAEEAQEoBycLFAkIAgQBDQUIGoMFgX1NAy4BAgygEQKBOYhigieCfwEBBYEvARNBgyYYggwDBoE4AYUdhwQagUE/gRFHgU5+PoJkAQECAQGBLAESASMrCYMMgiyNdIhJmTIKgjqHSoVGiVGCSIgQkDOOYohskjcCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWgjZ3FwFTuCbFAYDY4dg3OFFIU/dAKBJ4pZgSIBgQ8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,409,1574121600"; d="scan'208,217";a="430615294"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 Feb 2020 11:08:40 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 016B8e1L011015 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:08:40 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 05:08:39 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 06:08:38 -0500
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 05:08:38 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=XnBc1V590xYpW0DvqrbTxHSaxgm6IEpAtfIwEKTNqwtavAfJod6PRupGeuHR2b6wxsCcVrLAZIjvavczy/wkcguyWTuUJRjHkyxN0ulRkFAZwimD3b/2st5OfIvZl8Ay1SlRx9G695ltobo1+zRyqhUpuzP6mbz9KsNqCNOrhRj5K+jXOzSCuhSCzEfL/UtXozF87v23txUWQqm2aFQwSVJq9Up7furtHeZgbzktz2yxqiVrA1uHQPyTn5W3kv2plF68iY4EZiPwBTc7eU9jPr3j2ZE/jgjJPJknLlom7uLfKX1h7fpbUgXaKYFu//QCr9SKgTNhGxk3u8VAc5F2TA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=axHBiGFD73jQotxOKHJx3C0FQ17erasJ0E1dV6kLD2w=; b=CwWgpjfxXzzN4SMvVlJUpfOhBqc4p90Rep9MA1A2JtSfcxhFDxi99P4CmoSbNwmyZyUIi07FSGbSiyAy/zhNFpZaxxenwlP/U0AT9zXYzsgt3WcjKwu4OPqGlJlkkyJ1fU3/qM1r7ep5UaMoD8oyCohOWYo9HZbN8uDFRRZ8W8O5k2qGqEh6H0I0Tetxm+aBxyKwzE6TjeVwuu2FDZFWKuzBC5MwCAsBpy84IA6DTn0XMR2O7gHWMTfumWizznPdekX7NiNdV2YEGDZWA+ZjVi4aysQ2ZI1zoY9ga0jSGtMK4WIfDq83ik7fSXHmTGeg4V4NiGpPnNZwvL/i9iu76g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=axHBiGFD73jQotxOKHJx3C0FQ17erasJ0E1dV6kLD2w=; b=opt7zmA2I2akfhxrWvpbCQn1ALhSBjnaVjnmpQ2CxYl2Ibzq0C1euTIweaGiMeFt3MUHsaHQDe031juyWkgq9X9b12iK3ePlu05gaGK0cHG50WBvCERaDdKqAYDK6e0swkoQKbCq2q6Vr4X/ZFnJXuk53H8aoBuRikuxufuCN6E=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.228.31) by BYAPR11MB2598.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.229.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2707.23; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:08:37 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e4af:d550:3094:46cf]) by BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e4af:d550:3094:46cf%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2707.023; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:08:37 +0000
From: "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <fbrockne@cisco.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data
Thread-Index: AQHVxXo6Tdne2RKNvUiZXnvcjdbYaaf+7smAgA8/PXA=
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 11:08:36 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB258467266A6DBA5669411769DA1D0@BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <E5725DE6-0637-4D52-BD61-2437D29D3C3B@apple.com> <7E27249A-E86C-4E4C-9DD2-388D9741AD1D@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <7E27249A-E86C-4E4C-9DD2-388D9741AD1D@apple.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=fbrockne@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.58]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4eae4792-c297-4d72-4645-08d7aaf4ea18
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB2598:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB2598FDECEB2EEB8A8EBD0F97DA1D0@BYAPR11MB2598.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0305463112
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10001)(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(396003)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(199004)(189003)(7696005)(86362001)(9686003)(55016002)(4326008)(8676002)(64756008)(81166006)(81156014)(110136005)(66446008)(66476007)(66556008)(66946007)(107886003)(76116006)(316002)(2906002)(33656002)(52536014)(8936002)(5660300002)(53546011)(71200400001)(6506007)(478600001)(966005)(186003)(26005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB2598; H:BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: qJQyRAghhBNSgx8xd7kkXrlbkyKGzZgAqzBiiBJowXY4KxqRFqCF0gRSXXMQHsITIb7R/U9tbDUBjG6xGVKeEYb60wm6CtXcZNs7QQMcZJMvkdEv9znRwDu0LvuoDhTnD0AIJI/Ckno81pty88/jJg==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BYAPR11MB258467266A6DBA5669411769DA1D0BYAPR11MB2584namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4eae4792-c297-4d72-4645-08d7aaf4ea18
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Feb 2020 11:08:36.9317 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: WRhkCk+TmpPW251oy77scj1EEQwErTJ7+pyyRV9tvBEGrP+yioDdIRIChMrWdJgU1wEOrNN15kW4J9hZwFJVKA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB2598
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.15, xch-aln-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/bTkEIRNQaKqRmo9xiFi5lZ90EXk>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 11:08:44 -0000

Many thanks to all the reviewers of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 for their excellent and detailed feedback.

In order to structure process of including the feedback in the next revision of the document we've created a set of issues on git which not only contain the individual feedback, grouped by topic areas, but also suggest an approach on how to tackle an individual item:

  *   Issue #149: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Editorial<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/149>
  *   Issue #150: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Nomenclature<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/150>
  *   Issue #151: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Clarifications to SHOULD statements<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/151>
  *   Issue #152: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Add further detail/clarifications to existing definitions<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/152>
  *   Issue #153: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Changes to existing definitions<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/153>
  *   Issue #154: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Suggestions for additional data fields<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/154>
  *   Issue #155: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Security related<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/155>
  *   Issue #156: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Needs clarification on timestamp insertion in E2E option<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/156>
  *   Issue #157: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Editorial on Pre-allocated and Incremental Trace Options<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/157>
  *   Issue #158: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Trace-Flags Registry clarification<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/158>
  *   Issue #159: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Editorial DEX leftovers<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/159>

It would be great if you could review the list to ensure that it is complete and captures all the feedback received. It would also be great to receive feedback on the suggested approaches - either on git or here on the list, to help and guide creating appropriate text in the document.

Thanks much, Shwetha & Frank



From: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tommy Pauly
Sent: Montag,27. Januar 2020 19:09
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data

Hi IPPM,

Thanks for the feedback on this draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data!

Based on the reviews, we would like to see a new version of the document posted, so that the group can take a look at those changes and see if we think we're ready after that.

Authors, please post a new version when ready.

Best,
Tommy


On Jan 7, 2020, at 8:47 AM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:

Hello IPPM,

Happy New Year! This email starts a working group last call for "Data Fields for In-situ OAM" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data/).

The last call will end on Tuesday, January 21. Please reply to ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org> with your reviews and comments. Please indicate whether you think this document is ready for publication.

Best,
Tommy (as co-chair)
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm