From nobody Tue Dec 14 19:41:47 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04103A03AA for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:41:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nbj9iA2Z7pfC for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:41:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-il1-x134.google.com (mail-il1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E10D63A033F for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:41:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x134.google.com with SMTP id 15so18803617ilq.2 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:41:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AUKOGGgvt+CQWVlI3RSQiP8PIJb1ONCAfkIXSaLZc5M=; b=ihLkpdkfXuOdEr1saUbcG77P3j4LKHm0dh97IoywQdAYGQcaLWs/ZoHGeU0dFJqnXf Shx531RqCtPcOd5gKo+BhpN274dwgzKYRnf77zJ8uw+WJ+9xz3ahrI0Xwa4q+fRB3+9M mC1h1ozCV0EcQbOeEcRXhgcI7EhKY3waZR3zYqv251FM2NA8KM8z6fMbjPR+Muyu+TNj Tnto7zHhAf6R0Pkz+w4X9huh6px1BasLF++W0c2s6zr5INhI1svvHcqoaWWlJx4peLe6 EDx59OJADIEZlARAB1BfkttiCDyMnBCFenbnrul2WU7j1g628+4cAHg5V3TJFg5wkM1g o4iA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AUKOGGgvt+CQWVlI3RSQiP8PIJb1ONCAfkIXSaLZc5M=; b=DXpsOSl7/Acge8G3c3HLRY52LQjIPtx28iZ1fKcJQas2RNJ+Lj4lrjI/xJk9E51/Cd bWKzAGJSgu8ZMt1Y8DNQ/RHRv5dEl67RAmvBBXJqBoDH7Q+8tiGVR+bEupyylW4AijBt Z2Kq+jpCaC/PCArFRHIEaVTbng1X9nqOBlyL5X++yPXhrMb+2Pa7dYoIgZDU5SNoZCd/ 053DKH/1l3cKGPBCZ4HtHMy2KcDUg8pJew0L5A4ooOo/92JjOfEjxSLvESVWzh1bS2am oWRoNyMA74weyMtsBBMHTgwAnexnhhHvKiQoC+P6RVS1/52+IYxj3UTfD1z1oW8FbDYO TjWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532T0BSgN8uW6tpyw6jmKbcB8EvbHf6q2oow4DNcI/YjjAIOMvhW 4U7wQYzR29uLIruX/dy6QUhn7Kj/E03/Hqf7x/TtEwK9l1k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFjjHVEyAZb1c1MDR8M1OH53qQprJP4k5LQjTzqEb/SEiUPgmRKMOkd2hD0jlgKFv67XyqOBeKoOnyuqVNxbQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:b24:: with SMTP id e4mr5527191ilu.32.1639539698341; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:41:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: can desem Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:41:27 +1100 Message-ID: To: Marcus Ihlar Cc: "ippm@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000509bd305d327151a" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [ippm] draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 03:41:46 -0000 --000000000000509bd305d327151a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Marcus and all, I would like to express my support for the adoption of this protocol. I believe that this will be a really useful standards based tool for IP capacity measurement, especially at gigabit speeds and expect to see it widely adopted in the industry. Regards, Can Desem On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 2:52 AM Marcus Ihlar wrote: > Hi IPPM, > > > > This email starts an adoption call for > draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol, " Test Protocol for One-way > IP Capacity Measurement=E2=80=9D. This document is intended for Standard= s Track > and defines a protocol for measuring Network Capacity metrics defined in > RFC 9097 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9097/). > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protoc= ol/ > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-p= rotocol-02 > > > > This adoption call will last until *Monday, December 20*. Please review > the document, and reply to this email thread to indicate if you think IPP= M > should adopt this document. > > > > BR, > > Marcus > > > _______________________________________________ > ippm mailing list > ippm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm > --000000000000509bd305d327151a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Marcus and all,

I would like to expr= ess my support for the adoption of this protocol. I believe that this will = be a really useful standards based tool for IP capacity measurement, especi= ally at gigabit speeds and expect to see it widely adopted in the industry.=

Regards,
Can Desem

On Tue, Dec 7, = 2021 at 2:52 AM Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=3D40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org&g= t; wrote:

Hi IPPM,<= u>

= =C2=A0

This emai= l starts an adoption call for draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol, &= quot; Test Protocol for One-way IP Cap= acity Measurement=E2=80=9D.=C2=A0 This document is intended for Standards T= rack and defines a protocol for measuring Network Capacity metrics defined = in RFC 9097 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9097/).

= =C2=A0

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morton-ippm-capacity-met= ric-protocol/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-morton-ippm-c= apacity-metric-protocol-02

= =C2=A0

This adop= tion call will last until Monday, December 20. Please review the document, and reply to this e= mail thread to indicate if you think IPPM should adopt this document.

= =C2=A0

BR,

Marcus

=C2=A0

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
--000000000000509bd305d327151a--