IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] R: WG adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Mon, 18 December 2023 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BD4C14F5F7 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 02:03:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PmLRQDZ5uLZ9 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 02:03:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCEB7C14F60D for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 02:03:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4StwNn4MTyz6JBZ4 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 18:02:33 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.160.224]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9195140D96 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 18:03:46 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm100006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.196) by lhrpeml100006.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:03:45 +0000
Received: from kwepemd100004.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.31) by dggpemm100006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.196) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 18:03:43 +0800
Received: from kwepemd100004.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.31]) by kwepemd100004.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.31]) with mapi id 15.02.1258.028; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 18:03:43 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: "Bulgarella Fabio (Guest)" <fabio.bulgarella=40guest.telecomitalia.it@dmarc.ietf.org>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] R: WG adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01
Thread-Index: AQHaLaqyiHneb8sYAEW1sYM3xGWf7rCu1CKw
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:03:43 +0000
Message-ID: <995ce7f9c1e84ce693b7fbdbd6b62cb9@huawei.com>
References: <5D3E01EC-FFDD-45CE-BE2E-F37F8FA796B2@apple.com> <AM6PR07MB5973637E72478EFA401B5104B08DA@AM6PR07MB5973.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR07MB5973637E72478EFA401B5104B08DA@AM6PR07MB5973.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.66]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_995ce7f9c1e84ce693b7fbdbd6b62cb9huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/c0MJPDGiJ-Fy7Xcw2Q1bxdIDJ5U>
Subject: Re: [ippm] R: WG adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:03:53 -0000

Hi all,

I support the adoption of this document.

AFAIK alternate-marking has been used in many networks. In addition to being an guideline for future deployment, this document may also provide useful information about the deployment experience, such as problems incurred during some deployment and how they are solved.

Best regards,
Jie

From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bulgarella Fabio (Guest)
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 5:55 PM
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] R: WG adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01

Hi All,
I support the adoption of this draft.
It's a great guideline for alternate marking deployment.

Best Regards,
Fabio B.


Da: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org>> per conto di Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Data: martedì, 5 dicembre 2023, 18:33
A: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>>
Oggetto: [EXT] [ippm] WG adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01
Hello IPPM,

At IETF 118, we discussed adopting the informational draft "Alternate Marking Deployment Framework", which supplements RFC 9341 and RFC 9342 with deployment considerations.

This email starts a working group adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01, that will last until Friday, December 22.

Please review the document and provide feedback on whether or not you think IPPM should adopt this work, along with any comments on the document.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01

Best,
Tommy & Marcus


Gruppo TIM - Uso Interno - Tutti i diritti riservati.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status