[ippm] Old work on comparing metrics

Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net> Tue, 12 February 2008 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ippm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ippm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ippm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D19328C416; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:28:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.164, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4L43D5iF+7yq; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:28:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466CC28C22A; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:28:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DC928C1F2 for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:28:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wvXe+Pv4GbBM for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:28:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postman.ripe.net (postman.ripe.net [193.0.19.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43D128C204 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:28:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by postman.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 4008) id 982D723F22; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:29:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from herring.ripe.net (herring.ripe.net [193.0.1.203]) by postman.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4863C23EFC for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:29:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from RIPE-NCC-101045.local (gw.office.nsrp.ripe.net [193.0.1.126]) by herring.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C42C2F583 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:29:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <47B18322.1020507@ripe.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:29:38 +0100
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
X-RIPE-Spam-Level:
X-RIPE-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
X-RIPE-Spam-Status: N 0.002692 / -4.4
X-RIPE-Signature: 000b74882cc5768c568c8a291a660f63
Subject: [ippm] Old work on comparing metrics
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ippm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ippm-bounces@ietf.org

IPPM Group,

In Vancouver, I promised to dig up work on comparing implementations
of metrics that I (together with Rene, Sunil and Matt) did and presented
at PAM2000.  Here are the slides:

    http://amsterdamned.org/~henk/PAM2000.pdf

Question to the list: is a simple visual comparison sufficient for our
purposes (see slide 28), or should we do something more (see slide 33).

Henk

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net
RIPE Network Coordination Centre          http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk
P.O.Box 10096          Singel 258         Phone: +31.20.5354414
1001 EB Amsterdam      1016 AB Amsterdam  Fax: +31.20.5354445
The Netherlands        The Netherlands    Mobile: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is one of the choices leaving the office open?
                                       Alan Greenspan on the next elections
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm