IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] IETF 110 Draft Agenda Posted

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Sat, 20 February 2021 03:37 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CDA3A104B for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 19:37:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U_7zYWocJOK5 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 19:37:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B50C3A1049 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 19:37:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id j6so34367228ljo.5 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 19:37:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kUSLXAaCwvXKpLQ7HIvaS01tspZibfx31TBkh4+2EeE=; b=uE8C6mkUZA6pRyynZW2pb82kZN5OuZ5OT5LicHY4lU+b/StmbDtwm37TprrjmkMfYq U3ffwxfh64AqlCZ9lH59JjxyJzKwBIUOSHkgOvFFMevTzZQGnoCx5m/W9Ba8XurZ0I2N +/49hh4SC9mkIwOvPSeo4M5LRI0jaNwQ1RcEgcMJGz+D2DvHE2ZlO3GlGMSDM6efeg3P OqimSsO+K4oYmyZaOBTmnFeZne3Ye1/nZ34kq8/9c1zJpAXLrvIW0iBNszn4fdM7T9Bi hN9cTL2e2SG0Mrpm/Jpimpgs+k/H77bHxV2X/VgE1us3ixxjxDD6gI/IKaJkrW2CuJeR nzqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kUSLXAaCwvXKpLQ7HIvaS01tspZibfx31TBkh4+2EeE=; b=RpouuXYWtbRoZqAqBfBeUO1Q/2BcshM4WTe244M1v6lV7TcFdFPuDGbue9bfPHVBFn FN5+WLC9nwdNOfhiLIuIceb+zC0+Za6UqhJzfGdMZPb0TPe8mWr6STp01om5WuFoy/RA wSwjlYdSZaLSD7MCdPi/QOklTSib1k2Zpx+FGk7FMM54I2xnkmZfuLATg0uE7HyUceqD yH8vdQafpr6jnmZp7G5Kew4dsuFfauRaz636CjOnp04cpqv2CjFKLpguh24uJXPlKKwe nW0odzt0SAitHtt+toHJrjiIPt6mkvEHqE4R1iXqapNKIOEl2cmr+g5aUP1Lk4lO47Wc ychQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+qf+lyu5fuKCUwXilZtb2VoRuTpWsckDQYuzZ50zB0JZAfrA3 zoB+CqDhAqzXql+X3CRqcdQInpO8eyqqzqokFmaqesRnoFqLlA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyUenagpCikmm/GgmZFtC9O+BBLHGV2r0bjEvrhs7WGK7ocbo2Tj8x1NENPxyTiNS2ZHKCmsht74Ay79NRQZ3k=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:860a:: with SMTP id a10mr8015961lji.158.1613792270737; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 19:37:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5F5C0A34-DD09-4622-8828-6D3625703B06@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <5F5C0A34-DD09-4622-8828-6D3625703B06@apple.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 19:37:39 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmWOSH0ZdsCzNM=dTmh_kwz8kcFCbC9xCZT01ZN9yyoEnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000009e37505bbbc4bf8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/clIktGQbapc91EHQ0xzheLiqUtU>
Subject: Re: [ippm] IETF 110 Draft Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 03:37:55 -0000

Hi Tommy and Ian,
following comments we've received on draft-li-ippm-pm-on-lag, the authors
separated O/TWAMP and STAMP solutions. Also, the STAMP solution is solely
TLV-based without updating the STAMP base packet. We would greatly
appreciate an opportunity to present updates in one presentation,
preferably during the Friday session:

draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag; draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag        Presenter:
Greg Mirsky (tentatively)          Time: 10 min.

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:53 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello IPPM,
>
> I’ve just posted our draft agenda for IETF 110:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/agenda-110-ippm-00
>
> This time, we’ll have two separate sessions. The first session on Monday
> will be focused on trying to close out some discussions and make decisions
> for various IOAM documents. The second session on Friday will focus on the
> other working group documents, proposed work, and lightning talks. We do
> have additional lightning talk slots available, so please email the chairs
> if you are interested.
>
> Best,
> Tommy & Ian
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status