[ippm] Jim Guichard's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-03: (with DISCUSS)
Jim Guichard via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 01 May 2023 14:20 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D171BC13AE2A; Mon, 1 May 2023 07:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jim Guichard via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements@ietf.org, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, marcus.ihlar@ericsson.com, marcus.ihlar@ericsson.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 10.1.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Jim Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
Message-ID: <168295080384.49928.5675199861192112944@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2023 07:20:03 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/docJ7weJpredUx1SHZkLWaEL0rs>
Subject: [ippm] Jim Guichard's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-03: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 May 2023 14:20:03 -0000
Jim Guichard has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-03: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I am wondering why this is an informational document when it uses reserved bits from both QUIC and TCP headers (?). If those reserved bits are used by the mechanisms described in this document but there is no "official" allocation of the bits then future documents that wish to use these bits will be limited and/or clash with an Informational RFC. Adding a DISCUSS as although this is not a technical area of expertise for me, it seems unusual and I would like to better understand the document track selection. I also do not see a transport area directorate review and in fact the document shepherd highlights that the document could benefit from such a review. Given that the bits introduced in the document are suggested to be carried in the QUIC and TCP headers using their reserved bits, then a review by the area responsible for those transport protocols seems mandatory.
- [ippm] Jim Guichard's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-… Jim Guichard via Datatracker
- Re: [ippm] Jim Guichard's Discuss on draft-ietf-i… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [ippm] Jim Guichard's Discuss on draft-ietf-i… Martin Duke
- Re: [ippm] Jim Guichard's Discuss on draft-ietf-i… Tommy Pauly
- Re: [ippm] Jim Guichard's Discuss on draft-ietf-i… Tim Chown
- Re: [ippm] Jim Guichard's Discuss on draft-ietf-i… James Guichard
- Re: [ippm] Jim Guichard's Discuss on draft-ietf-i… James Guichard
- Re: [ippm] Jim Guichard's Discuss on draft-ietf-i… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [ippm] Jim Guichard's Discuss on draft-ietf-i… James Guichard