IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Call for Adoption of draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 01 September 2022 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F910C15270B; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 13:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ynWiwY-Sphiq; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 13:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1F79C1526FF; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 13:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 281KoqPQ032278; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:50:52 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F8F4604A; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:50:52 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0589A46043; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:50:52 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:50:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (152.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.152] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 281KoomY022995 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:50:51 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Tommy Pauly' <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, 'IETF IPPM WG' <ippm@ietf.org>
References: <1BCD27D1-4A44-4FF1-BD91-C6B78F0F03A3@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <1BCD27D1-4A44-4FF1-BD91-C6B78F0F03A3@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 21:50:46 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <0b0801d8be44$854e62b0$8feb2810$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0B09_01D8BE4C.E7138E00"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQK3x5806cEuNNhg56Lt04zEs8TWIawM+H0A
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.152
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27114.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--25.952-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--25.952-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27114.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--25.951700-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: TmlY9+XBoTnxIbpQ8BhdbEWX0DfhVamwl9q75JzWJRMvfU/riSJXkRkh ChIO6vg8eSj+2iiKL6/4pkcixuThjFgojh/aIsxLl1VzLtWj2rzF11Guem0557V5fSMRD1zqk8N uKSQycgIvhknzPfE6SE/oOc6RTelvKl7ih+SW4+z0hv/rD7WVZMTGavmGo0vWFOEdrahdS/1Vxr LAkLGCergfsDQ6cecxF5cXjwszASxHW+94FA8JF8G0UNgaZpYqN5dqZcIK7VhrbYQHGx62S/dIm 8S+G8+gLsvndq11AZKbVVXilP6Qq/CDFvXZFmYyYeSLiGsUzvlU4sxFq6igEVCd7VOgbE3otAOC wsfpNBQv9/13kks14VPSAWHDBcndWpIdEoPquH/iTsyDsnGzT7TxnpbCjruIX5/bNhAsGyQPY7E c0tWek3Cs42g24Z/z+MOUD1zmrJ1S6W5UT/L39A99YSq5q1Sp1ViV5EWK7TvTdxWpA5MtbKPFjJ EFr+ol6AvlZUR4TshZZmMIUsIQGsC4UUZr4lSFDfsxlhAfVLxheV+crsE6IQP90fJP9eHt
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/e0__lq-G1q9WPmpfB2VYfIULH2Q>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for Adoption of draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 20:51:29 -0000

Hi Tommy,

 

As might be expected from a Contributor to this work, I think this document is something that it would be good to work on. 

I did a review of -01 which has been addressed in the new -02, and I think the content is now detailed enough to form the basis of WG work.

 

Cheers,

Adrian

 

From: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tommy Pauly
Sent: 01 September 2022 18:26
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] Call for Adoption of draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam

 

Hello IPPM,

 

As discussed at IETF 114, we’re starting an adoption call for Precision Availability Metrics for SLO-Governed End-to-End Services, draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam.

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam/

 

The current version is here:

 

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam-02.html

 

Please reply to this email by Thursday, September 15, to indicate whether you support adoption of this draft.

 

Best,

Tommy & Marcus

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status