Re: [ippm] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-route-09: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 11 August 2020 00:22 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A0E3A0E53; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 17:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MGzg2UttJ-gV; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 17:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EEF83A0E50; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 17:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 07B0MKi3018750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:22:22 -0400
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 17:22:19 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-route@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-route@ietf.org>, "ippm-chairs@ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
Message-ID: <20200811002219.GV92412@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <159684607533.31002.15812261886117245073@ietfa.amsl.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF0140BC7270@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF0140BC7270@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/eGnTKKwBHIo-71R7xy9WTzL6YoY>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-route-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:22:29 -0000

Hi Al,

On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 06:09:53PM +0000, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
> Thanks for your review and Comments, Ben.
> Please see replies [acm] below,

Thanks for the updates and the illuminative replies.  I don't have any
further comments, so trimming the quoted text.

-Ben