[ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang
Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> Thu, 18 February 2016 16:59 UTC
Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215831B2F70 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:59:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.092
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT=1.107, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38TGReMPV3wM for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:59:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usplmg20.ericsson.net (usplmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 741A01B2F67 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:59:17 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c618062d-f79dd6d000003091-1c-56c5f482169f
Received: from EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.93]) by usplmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 08.CF.12433.284F5C65; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:42:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.93]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:59:15 -0500
From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
To: "draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org" <draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang
Thread-Index: AdFqbLsNtCaeQhkcSNaNNzLViFP6yQ==
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:59:14 +0000
Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF112219CC404@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.11]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF112219CC404eusaamb103erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPrG7Tl6NhBl+ui1nsX3iVxaLnwTtm ByaPJUt+Mnl8ufyZLYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugStj+Y+PjAXv5CpmtO5gbWC8L9XFyMkhIWAi cW9VMyuELSZx4d56ti5GLg4hgSOMEp/3trJDOMsZJTYsOMEOUsUmYCTxYmMPmC0ikCixc/Ji MJtZQFli76v5jCC2sICaRPP1GawQNdoSh1eeYIaw9SSO3TwLZrMIqEr0n/vEBGLzCvhK3N2x CCzOCHTF91NrmCBmikvcejKfCeI6AYkle84zQ9iiEi8f/4O6Wkni4+/5UDfkS7yfvZoVYqag xMmZT1gmMArPQjJqFpKyWUjKIOI6Egt2f2KDsLUlli18zQxjnznwmAlZfAEj+ypGjtLigpzc dCODTYzAODkmwaa7g/H+dM9DjAIcjEo8vAW/j4QJsSaWFVfmHmKU4GBWEuGt+nw0TIg3JbGy KrUoP76oNCe1+BCjNAeLkjjvUof1YUIC6YklqdmpqQWpRTBZJg5OqQZGTv3SRYolZQ1Kp3ab fuJZd7ejXCnjxNTqvp5Mo/YkL4VM6bIE2eVBy54uLNJfompt8lJDZ9b1HSGCGQpNzhMd2T5/ ZQxeGvUnLaktvewSd4XX+ttqx+6zPH98ffU6Bsuo81/WXAvb3TXrln9hmrK+1OZvnR3fGud2 FoVNWjm55uOFF4nvDV2VWIozEg21mIuKEwF1rmI2jwIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/eczFQtbS423f01RmPsx0QoxEH_o>
Cc: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:59:19 -0000
Dear Authors,
I've noticed that detailed data model examples in Appendix A use UDP port numbers from the registered range of UDP port numbers. The registered range is administered by IANA and port numbers should not be used for applications other than it was registered to. I believe that UDP port numbers for TWAMP test must be used from dynamic, private range of port numbers 49152-65535. Use of port numbers described in RFC 6335 in details.
What do you think?
Regards,
Greg
- [ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang Gregory Mirsky
- [ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang Srivathsa Sarangapani
- Re: [ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang Srivathsa Sarangapani