Re: [ippm] Calls for adoption as WG items

[Joachim Fabini <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Brian, IPPM,

Having finally read (1) and (2) I support adoption of these
drafts/milestones. I will submit a summary of my review to the list
for discussion within the next week(s) and I plan to contribute to the
review process of these two documents in the future.

best regards
Joachim




On 02.07.2014 11:30, Brian Trammell wrote:
> Greetings, IPPM,
> 
> A gentle reminder: We would like very much to have discussion on
> adoption completed before the Toronto meeting, so we can spend face
> to face time on the documents themselves. And we cannot adopt
> drafts as Working Group items for which there is not a strong
> demonstration of support and commitment to read, review, and
> improve the drafts.
> 
> So, please see last week's call for adoption notice, consider
> whether you support adoption of the named drafts, and whether you
> can commit to review them.
> 
> The deadline for this call for adoption is, as before, end of day
> Thursday 10 July 2014.
> 
> Many thanks and best regards,
> 
> Brian Trammell, as co-chair.
> 
> On 24 Jun 2014, at 16:17, Brian Trammell <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> Greetings, IPPM,
>> 
>> This is a call for adoption for four new milestones under the
>> current IPPM charter.
>> 
>> (1) Submit a draft updating RFC2679 based on testing and
>> implementation experience (RFC 6808) to the IESG as Proposed
>> Standard (under consideration for this milestone is
>> draft-morton-ippm-2679-bis-04)
>> 
>> (2) Submit a draft updating RFC2680 based on testing and
>> implementation experience (draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05)
>> to the IESG as Proposed Standard (under consideration for this
>> milestone is draft-morton-ippm-2679-bis-04)
>> 
>> (3) Submit a draft adding DSCP and ECN monitoring to TWAMP to the
>>  IESG as Proposed Standard (under consideration for this
>> milestone is draft-hedin-ippm-type-p-monitor-03)
>> 
>> (4) Submit a draft adding a UDP Checksum Trailer to OWAMP and
>> TWAMP to the IESG as Informational (under consideration for this
>> milestone is draft-mizrahi-ippm-checksum-trailer-00)
>> 
>> For each draft, please indicate the following to the list at
>> [e-mail]
>> 
>> (a) whether you support the addition of the milestone and the
>> adoption of the draft as a WG item to fulfill that milestone (b)
>> whether you have read the draft (c) whether you pledge to review
>> the draft during the WG process.
>> 
>> This call for adoption will last until Thursday 10 July 2014.
>> 
>> Many thanks, best regards,
>> 
>> Brian
>> 
>> On 02 Jun 2014, at 18:07, Brian Trammell <[e-mail]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Greetings, IPPM,
>>> 
>>> Thanks and congratulations to the authors on the approval of
>>> our first draft from the "new" (March 2013) charter!
>>> 
>>> As we're moving forward in our charter, it's time to consider
>>> adopting new drafts.
>>> 
>>> I've seen implicit requests for a call for adoption for the
>>> following two drafts, which were not adopted in Orlando because
>>> we wanted to see if 2330-update would change their scope
>>> significantly:
>>> 
>>> draft-morton-ippm-2679-bis-04 draft-morton-ippm-2680-bis-02
>>> 
>>> We have at least one explicit request for a call for adoption:
>>> 
>>> draft-hedin-ippm-type-p-monitor-03
>>> 
>>> If there are other documents which you would like to have
>>> considered for adoption as IPPM WG items in the next round
>>> under the present charter, please notify the chairs at
>>> [e-mail] by Friday, June 6th; we'll run the
>>> call for adoption after that.
>>> 
>>> Thanks, cheers,
>>> 
>>> Brian (as chair)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>>> From: The IESG <[e-mail]> Subject: Document
>>>> Action: 'Advanced Stream and Sampling Framework for IPPM' to
>>>> Informational RFC (draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05.txt) Date:
>>>> 29 May 2014 21:41:55 GMT+2 Resent-To: [e-mail],
>>>> [e-mail], To: IETF-Announce <[e-mail]> 
>>>> Cc: RFC Editor <[e-mail]>, ippm mailing list
>>>> <[e-mail]>, ippm chair <[e-mail]>
>>>> 
>>>> The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Advanced
>>>> Stream and Sampling Framework for IPPM' 
>>>> (draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05.txt) as Informational RFC
>>>> 
>>>> This document is the product of the IP Performance Metrics
>>>> Working Group.
>>>> 
>>>> The IESG contact persons are Spencer Dawkins and Martin
>>>> Stiemerling.
>>>> 
>>>> A URL of this Internet Draft is: 
>>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Technical Summary
>>>> 
>>>> To obtain repeatable results in modern networks, test
>>>> descriptions need an expanded stream parameter framework that
>>>> also augments aspects specified as Type-P for test packets.
>>>> This memo updates the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)
>>>> Framework, RFC 2330, with advanced considerations for
>>>> measurement methodology and testing. The existing framework
>>>> mostly assumes deterministic connectivity, and that a single
>>>> test stream will represent the characteristics of the path
>>>> when it is aggregated with other flows.  Networks have
>>>> evolved and test stream descriptions must evolve with them,
>>>> otherwise unexpected network features may dominate the
>>>> measured performance. This memo describes new stream
>>>> parameters for both network characterization and support of
>>>> application design using IPPM metrics.
>>>> 
>>>> Working Group Summary
>>>> 
>>>> This draft was first introduced to the working group in
>>>> October 2012. Support for the draft was indicated at meetings
>>>> with no dissent.
>>>> 
>>>> Document Quality
>>>> 
>>>> As an update to the IPPM Framework, this document adds new
>>>> and updated considerations for stream parameters.
>>>> 
>>>> The document shepherd reviewed the document as a “-02” draft
>>>> and reviewed the changes which constitute “-03” and “-04”.
>>>> 
>>>> As documented, other topics in the IPPM Framework which might
>>>> be updated or augmented are deferred to future work.  This 
>>>> includes the topics of passive and various forms of of hybrid
>>>>  active/passive measurements.
>>>> 
>>>> Personnel
>>>> 
>>>> The document shepherd was Bill Cerveny. The responsible area
>>>> director is Spencer Dawkins.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ ippm mailing
>>> list [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ ippm mailing
>> list [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list 
> [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTu5LFAAoJEKCP3BPvRqfSawMH/2S+os0oHNt6MrCWIY9Tbpas
9nu/chFiah4vKNVbak4n8ac3TmZZtGw0QIyL0dev1ZssUwUjArlZrzET7IoqnLr1
lbVFoPA0tyuR+AH0XaBCDB/CepbYwOq/L7IpUKAY0hVVZtuaXQcZL5/JI1LsxK0o
2RrQOiClLGl/ihaPyuLibEl8C3GrJIV29IN/bp3S2jk4YyymI8nebJJSn7vS4xAf
IlB31d2F201PfiM25RKKyZEIZNbUtpQ1nbrImZCdhz5zRSCENad8z57Vki3vZ14P
jvSWgz0HIKA3jRyhn/mv7fFjRL9H6FuK6y2gKACCKzYo5QvX4odSgqF6pkVzuw4=
=xw7U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----