[ippm] stamp session id
Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Wed, 13 November 2019 06:56 UTC
Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEC812085B; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 22:56:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YfjbPRVtyIKg; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 22:56:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1FCC1200CD; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 22:56:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id EA0231EA827ABFCC3677; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:56:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:56:55 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 14:56:45 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: "draft-ietf-ippm-stamp.authors@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-stamp.authors@ietf.org>
CC: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: stamp session id
Thread-Index: AdWZ7wpG5e2GoUb6THad4fshKdUfHg==
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:56:45 +0000
Message-ID: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BF0A5846@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.156.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/fuUG1Uiu_22ps_EZk8dgVfc6AME>
Subject: [ippm] stamp session id
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:56:59 -0000
Hi Authors, I am looking at the stamp yang. And I see we need to configure the "session-id". But I did not see the session id in the STAMP data plane packet(draft-ietf-ippm-stamp). How to align the sender and reflector? Or did I miss something? Thanks, Tianran
- [ippm] stamp session id Tianran Zhou
- Re: [ippm] stamp session id Greg Mirsky