IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv

Jai Kumar <jai.kumar@broadcom.com> Tue, 09 July 2019 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <jai.kumar@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EEC120285 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 10:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.703
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.703 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GklY3UyZt5Xh for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 10:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C29301201F1 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 10:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id t16so9605025pfe.11 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 10:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=jAYlX0Lb+p8Tlpx5yuIhVgNO1suxcsiFUDe573HVTuE=; b=RI4/WJw/Of5qY36QbladTL+LRGgiok9/jcfmOov2QJdshw8VpHAUWhofl8c7FiCk+X eoYaGQEo/Njpc/5tdKoJ4eWMkifOYJrK5nTVJDw/YfvVuGVmTvOJpAgc0Qh0TXm37vfC PpqzkYU7xrSfCF4Zaa0mtgu5ITU81wdFW9Ajc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=jAYlX0Lb+p8Tlpx5yuIhVgNO1suxcsiFUDe573HVTuE=; b=bkH3CxAFlHRfmzHvmPxy2XgGszRd7mSuepAIPqRTajUSapwIKv5d+43b4ka/l4usQE b59uNPALGQcY17c+8Gt8VNHX0Dww3UqHBMUjjvnY2pPiiHSc8i6hWx9a1FKtP+Gqv3sq CVMYkNbac6EZe8bDSkRFPPb+tsuZmDxlaSUk3IWm35FJeSLyFHV43/HhkFXriXHPqU3t q24LQ1DquhA1F3sH31Nv3GpcY6PFUTyV9tFcK6KN7WwCTHLtMwqwRdwYRJY00+3/H47E o84LEK8tJknBaf71h6oKRcB9oazFk/CjyjFDnOCMCx44HjliYN1R9IXNmWjwCl54bnYw A+iw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUSd075s+/xhvbMk97YEEDJfub7ZXSQP1tRPaIOejYlQ9ygcUdq E6ndekBKsWnWdxi3mbQBs4EdZA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzb/JnJzZkhlS1S941IvbXlO7LA7ei8XbdsMc++Ur9/BfxQEgRxyna1Mcj9a6Mnn2PQvuGUbA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:e018:: with SMTP id e24mr31519144pgh.361.1562692734111; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 10:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.58.68.119] ([192.19.222.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2sm3041952pjs.21.2019.07.09.10.18.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 10:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1a.0.190609
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 10:18:51 -0700
From: Jai Kumar <jai.kumar@broadcom.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
CC: draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv@ietf.org
Message-ID: <BB58B7D0-605F-4597-9205-9D58BAE4B108@broadcom.com>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv
References: <C3852A60-4580-47E9-A998-C0026D36523B@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <C3852A60-4580-47E9-A998-C0026D36523B@apple.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3645512332_1912335074"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/fvNmtrxKozHnO3n-taG6MR4ty2c>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:18:57 -0000

Yes/Support.

 

-Jai

 

From: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Date: Monday, July 8, 2019 at 3:53 PM
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv

 

Hello IPPM,

 

This message begins an adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv, "Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol Optional Extensions”. The document has been discussed on the list recently, with good input and reviews from the group. We’d like to get the working group’s input on if this document should be adopted and worked on by the group.

 

The current status and text of the document can be found here:

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv/

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-05

 

Please respond to this email by Tuesday, July 23 to indicate whether or not you think IPPM should adopt and work on the extensions and extension mechanism described in this draft.

 

Best,
Tommy (as IPPM co-chair)

_______________________________________________ ippm mailing list ippm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email