IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ippm] Re: draft-fz-ippm-on-path-telemetry-yang (On-path Telemetry YANG Data Model )

Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@uliege.be> Tue, 15 April 2025 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <justin.iurman@uliege.be>
X-Original-To: ippm@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881901C2691F; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 02:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=uliege.be
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IlNrk5pyM1SP; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 02:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be (serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23B6E1C26917; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 02:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.58] (220.24-245-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [81.245.24.220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 764DC200F481; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:44:15 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be 764DC200F481
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uliege.be; s=ulg20190529; t=1744710255; bh=949qGCQY7VeTjfBoxBRT/3GLGJzzfgXrzUTb3GSSyHo=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=QnX1/ooMqKylE7ZxqlgRf7Xz17mGOqZjPWa0Z2h5EtP2Z8M/QE15MYoRab6kwNEp9 9NsGjVWHYvGTwbg3vNjktcFaneyaulZ/fhHU+w9TxX4SoZRnNFFVfmme1ClU7X0kCE 7vJ4YORjNGnF5UbzG0MI6dTT2Ad3xpMk/T33cOo2Bdtr3PcY9QVUzxpdFLVknn6kl+ uCqOQGm650s+1Ro1CK6cCUJKOG9DzlAI5kCq/PqPsADV7mqy9/9o1ToStGrFNcrAGD RG1dSh5FWShhOOUJyEV98v5yGO1IfU0/oIrTC98SmpDVcSrq/eOCFKVpo6yU08jUVC nxKpL7NRKK1nQ==
Message-ID: <e6bdc46b-1c8a-4037-820e-cf2ac955cdb1@uliege.be>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:44:15 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com, ippm@ietf.org
References: <ZR1P278MB1170F261DEB64A9FABA72D7889B32@ZR1P278MB1170.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@uliege.be>
In-Reply-To: <ZR1P278MB1170F261DEB64A9FABA72D7889B32@ZR1P278MB1170.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: R5Q4VDGWDIUZN7PI3V5XUCZIU2X4ST3J
X-Message-ID-Hash: R5Q4VDGWDIUZN7PI3V5XUCZIU2X4ST3J
X-MailFrom: justin.iurman@uliege.be
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ippm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-fz-ippm-on-path-telemetry-yang.authors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [ippm] Re: draft-fz-ippm-on-path-telemetry-yang (On-path Telemetry YANG Data Model )
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/gxSpt10dQf7qDdEmeeVZwf-egOM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ippm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ippm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ippm-leave@ietf.org>

Hi,

Support adoption. As discussed during the meeting in Bangkok, the model 
could use some improvements (tradeoffs to be discussed), but it's in 
good shape for the working to adopt it and start working on it.

Cheers,
Justin

On 4/14/25 12:08, Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com wrote:
> Dear IPPM,
> 
> As the IPR poll has concluded (no IPR has been reported), the authors 
> and chairs would like to call for adoption of
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-fz-ippm-on-path-telemetry-yang-01 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-fz-ippm-on-path-telemetry-yang-01>
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fz-ippm-on-path-telemetry-yang/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fz-ippm-on-path-telemetry-yang/>
> 
> Please reply on-list to this email with comments, support for, or 
> reasons not to adopt this work as a WG document.
> 
> We will run a three-week adoption call, ending on May 5th.
> 
> Best wishes
> 
> Thomas and Marcus
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list -- ippm@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ippm-leave@ietf.org

v2.36.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status