Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-02.txt

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Ho J.Ignacio,
thank you for the comment and helpful suggestion. Will read the
draft-alavarez-hamelin-tictoc-sic and respond accordingly in a short time.
>From the quick run through the draft, I agree with you that ECDSA offers
advantages over the SHA1 of the same length. Just need to check for
possible impact on YANG data model.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 2:26 AM J Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
> Today at the IPPM meeting I said that you could consider using SHA1 256
> with bits for authentication, to respect some security standards. Your
> comment that is expensive, and I agree with that.
> I propose another alternative, is the one that I used in
> draft-alavarez-hamelin-tictoc-sic-02, the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature
> Algorithm (ECDSA), which yields in few bits and has some securities form de
> cryptographic point of view.
>
>
> Best withes,
>
>         J. Ignacio
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Dr. Ing. José Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin
> CONICET and Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires
> Av. Paseo Colón 850 - C1063ACV - Buenos Aires - Argentina
> [phone] / 5285 0705
> e-mail: [e-mail]
> web: http://cnet.fi.uba.ar/ignacio.alvarez-hamelin/
> _______________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> > On 16 Oct 2018, at 05:24, Brian Trammell (IETF) <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> >
> > hi Greg,
> >
> > We'll put this and a tentative start of WGLC on the Bangkok agenda.
> >
> > Thanks, cheers,
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >> On 16 Oct 2018, at 01:00, Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Brian,
> >> my apologies for the delayed response. The new version of the draft has
> been just uploaded. The updates include the new section that describes
> authentication and encryption operations on STAMP packets. I'd request the
> presentation slot at the meeting and, if there are no significant concerns,
> would ask to consider starting the WG LC on the base specification. The
> work on the STAMP YANG data model still on-going and we're addressing the
> comments from the early YANG Doctors review by Mahesh. I expect we'll have
> the new version by the end of November.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Greg
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:12 AM Brian Trammell (IETF) <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> >> hi Greg,
> >>
> >> following up a bit late, perhaps... when do you think this will be
> ready for LC?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Brian (as WG co-chair)
> >>
> >>> On 8 Sep 2018, at 00:53, Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dear All,
> >>> minor editorial improvements to the document..
> >>> Your comments, questions, and suggestions always welcome and much
> appreciated.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Greg
> >>>
> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>> From: <[e-mail]>
> >>> Date: Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 2:56 PM
> >>> Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-02.txt
> >>> To: [e-mail]
> >>> Cc: [e-mail]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> >>> This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Measurement WG of the
> IETF.
> >>>
> >>>        Title           : Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol
> >>>        Authors         : Greg Mirsky
> >>>                          Guo Jun
> >>>                          Henrik Nydell
> >>>                          Richard Foote
> >>>        Filename        : draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-02.txt
> >>>        Pages           : 14
> >>>        Date            : 2018-09-07
> >>>
> >>> Abstract:
> >>>   This document describes a Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol
> >>>   which enables measurement of both one-way and round-trip performance
> >>>   metrics like delay, delay variation, and packet loss.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp/
> >>>
> >>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-02
> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-02
> >>>
> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-02
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> >>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >>>
> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> ippm mailing list
> >>> [e-mail]
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> ippm mailing list
> >>> [e-mail]
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ippm mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
>