Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measurements Techniques
Nicolas Kuhn <nicolas.kuhn.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 14 October 2021 14:31 UTC
Return-Path: <nicolas.kuhn.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0BA3A16CE for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 07:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ipvkmJgUGVKz for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 07:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 404843A09EC for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 07:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id x27so28147262lfu.5 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 07:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gAHUXjWVGkq64SLpKSZRESyl/ia2SwFAHx78EgLBWGc=; b=asPsSSfDtAy4QO1TeHCo3BW5i1zhnrecoMYIxjyJhRDVJ3kuUeFd9i+AYX3e+uQx28 FTiIL9ge12UmrsHQwIn2rYR8dfr076YJHR9L25+UnlVasOBUE6xNzRTqKVPLIs+zGgFZ kSPDlkQGKndSGFRsJXExDGIATLOlssJJV6HkRR2muQhcE1elR0u/itfQoc5V8yQVsIpO je/jw4AmjqPPr0Mlyw+HXEk7Nw7yLAxak0IKXu9T8YI0dowfgq/ME2kPPvBaj4Ji06U2 tY/yOzg1vfHoVdHQLYyitjJL8PdbrR4Fa5vRVNe5Yr12X+PWeqfwTFBBCzrD6QFhuuKq iydw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gAHUXjWVGkq64SLpKSZRESyl/ia2SwFAHx78EgLBWGc=; b=mMo/gqMmXYEIM3npB572OefIyRtBVtlJryX1YC9q8jv6Akh8sZY+veTaKgfPLDLrby 4GQnnmRNaUYz8cw/7mT54n+135v9qwNvH4+LlTWlJrZNFzZp8BoCg8lN5hNBn5PumD2R Rtzmg2awff2Vkpv1L+YpzL8OB1uM4vKz+cgO/fokdaU1LStC9BTeatXNwtk5vyjQZAp/ gCDPcPQYuMtryDRByvmDUGm3VF/+cVlsF3dk4Uim9LQ0wnG55fA1DudvQ+LxJX5MF2oE 4sJZzox22MM49UoeRFfhClzG5FIoO5y6AgoiZXRt7wgAqk6brL1QR+pqyGnZaTCvvEsJ /GDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gCOXdR3erSx4BNff0hJV9RIIVwBAZXegGpDBp4feqO0/fMtMY dhSGt+Pi41sPUAQGKC2uIPg8GObFKak12XK/mLtLpIu9Z30=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxV9MNIdFWnCLkJYiFS+m7G56Ed7Mdq6Bc99KNWjWDxDUmRiWOYdhnRwCXICY/rgtLNqa+8IgofD/wybyyYNMU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1508:: with SMTP id bq8mr5477707lfb.68.1634221878100; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 07:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A318EC97-859A-4723-9211-03B1CBF74374@apple.com> <CA+RyBmU4dJaLkjVYRX=-ZwKoLV5SGXQXjmaACwaRuLJinnn6qQ@mail.gmail.com> <3240de1f-2fe5-f290-78d0-44c51dd809f9@clemm.org> <AM0PR07MB41319F00A2C8100539EE19CEE2B89@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB41319F00A2C8100539EE19CEE2B89@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Nicolas Kuhn <nicolas.kuhn.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 16:31:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL0D2oRUiydJSK-uuLZascDSGJr54TCf6aHDmtKSuiuSurjyRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000087452505ce50ee22"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/hdEEPo0JYNzYZwtf_EumNHfZkGw>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measurements Techniques
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:31:25 -0000
Dear all, I support the adoption of the draft. On a side note, it may be worth pointing out RFC9065, with the proposed approach being 'beneficial' (as opposed to malicious!). " Current uses of transport header information by network devices on the Internet path are explained. These uses can be beneficial or malicious. This is written to provide input to the discussion around what is an appropriate balance by highlighting some implications of transport header encryption. " Cheers Nico On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 4:09 PM Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar= 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Speaking purely as an individual here and not as co-chair. > > I support the adoption of this draft, it serves as a good foundation to > advance our understanding of the utility of end-to-end marking bits. > > > > Marcus > > > > *From:* ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Alexander L Clemm > *Sent:* den 13 oktober 2021 07:06 > *To:* ippm@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measurements > Techniques > > > > Dear all, > > I think that a description of various flow measurement techniques using > various types of marking bits will make for a useful informational document > with substance. I support adoption as well. > > --- Alex > > On 10/12/2021 9:40 AM, Greg Mirsky wrote: > > Dear All, > > I support adoption of this draft. On-path telemetry is an essential OAM > tool. > > > > Regards, > > Greg > > > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 8:59 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly= > 40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hello IPPM, > > > > This email starts an adoption call for > draft-mdt-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements, "Explicit Flow Measurements > Techniques”. This document is proposed as an Informational document that > describes techniques that go beyond single bit markings like the QUIC spin > bit. > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mdt-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements/ > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mdt-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-02 > > > > This adoption call will last until *Friday, October 22*. Please review > the document, and reply to this email thread to indicate if you think IPPM > should adopt this document. > > > > Best, > > Tommy > > _______________________________________________ > ippm mailing list > ippm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ippm mailing list > > ippm@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm > > _______________________________________________ > ippm mailing list > ippm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm >
- [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measuremen… Tommy Pauly
- Re: [ippm] [EXT] Adoption call for Explicit Flow … Bulgarella Fabio (Guest)
- [ippm] R: [EXT] Adoption call for Explicit Flow M… Cociglio Mauro
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measur… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measur… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measur… Alexander L Clemm
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measur… Nilo Massimo
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measur… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measur… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measur… Nicolas Kuhn
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measur… emile.stephan
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measur… Haoyu Song
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measur… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measur… Lubashev, Igor
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measur… Ike Kunze
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for Explicit Flow Measur… Tommy Pauly