Re: [ippm] IPR Call regarding draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Sat, 19 August 2017 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C964B1329DD; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 12:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qV4rjlb3goha; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 12:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73749132819; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 12:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8258; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1503172219; x=1504381819; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=j9rwLg6GjoiLFKM0f/ekL7+OzO8P3/PnJIQ/3+9V7Ig=; b=Ra3Vc9S5TOhB3GFVFlJgxzmgiHJsdMqoG5QFgVSp48QxIlGAaAp2ptw1 APMZ5ArRQGBmvW+nEQtJ2zW4sQJLW4LG9E8r9NUv6KxbzAD0bR62GhJhW LW5QRID3FN/RNhpIZLEB3rhFjmmt4RVsr0BvYiAIbnlKDHRja0yhEhPaR Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ChAAAilphZ/5ldJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1pkgRUHjguQE5JThTkOggQohR8CGoNUPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrHQuFGQYjVhACAQg/AwICAjAUEQIEDgWJTWQQsA6CJotgAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWDKIICgUyBYyuCfIQ9AwESATaCfDCCMQWYHYgyAodSjG6CEIVhim2WHwEfOH8LdxVJEgGHB3aIMYEjgQ8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,398,1498521600"; d="scan'208,217";a="471974938"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Aug 2017 19:50:18 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com (xch-rtp-017.cisco.com [64.101.220.157]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7JJoILk029795 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 19 Aug 2017 19:50:18 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com (64.101.220.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 15:50:17 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 15:50:17 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: "draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark@ietf.org>
CC: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, "luca.castaldelli@telecomitalia.it" <luca.castaldelli@telecomitalia.it>, Lianshu Zheng <vero.zheng@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: IPR Call regarding draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark
Thread-Index: AQHTC5OWXg3lKibFKkmSfq5E/KvZ46KMdKCA
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 19:50:17 +0000
Message-ID: <C699B27D-2CAE-4DB4-8EA3-F4253904F60F@cisco.com>
References: <ED9E6D07-FFCF-4756-A2D8-58CC859B8D4E@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <ED9E6D07-FFCF-4756-A2D8-58CC859B8D4E@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.116.138]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C699B27D2CAE4DB48EA3F4253904F60Fciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/hddaKch0PI9DXa_ApwrjQSs_5vk>
Subject: Re: [ippm] IPR Call regarding draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 19:50:22 -0000

Thank you for all the responses, authors and contributors.

Following-up, the following two responses are still pending:
L. Castaldelli
L. Zheng, Ed.

Luca, Vero, can you please reply to the poll so that we move forward with the doc?

Thanks!

Carlos.

On Aug 2, 2017, at 9:31 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <cpignata@cisco.com<mailto:cpignata@cisco.com>> wrote:

Dear IPPM,

This email starts an IPR call on draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-06, in preparation to document advancement.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-06?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There is one IPR disclosure filed directly against this draft-tempia-ippm-p3m:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2557/

_Action_:

If you are listed as a document author, editor, or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. These responses are needed for the shepherd questionnaire.

If you are on the IPPM WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

This poll will run for a week, or until all contributors respond.

Thanks!

—
Carlos Pignataro, carlos@cisco.com<mailto:carlos@cisco.com>

“Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound more photosynthesis."