Re: [ippm] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-22: (with COMMENT)

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com> Wed, 04 December 2019 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <acm@research.att.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD327120834; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:34:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id czNiFWCZsiIB; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F09191208E9; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:34:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049297.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xB4HOxll020900; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 12:34:30 -0500
Received: from tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (sbcsmtp3.sbc.com [144.160.112.28]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2wpdrspgyy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 04 Dec 2019 12:34:29 -0500
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id xB4HYS57118503; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:34:29 -0600
Received: from zlp30494.vci.att.com (zlp30494.vci.att.com [135.46.181.159]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id xB4HYNFp118309 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:34:23 -0600
Received: from zlp30494.vci.att.com (zlp30494.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30494.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 3CD1B4009E76; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:34:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (unknown [135.41.1.46]) by zlp30494.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 1DF374009E72; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:34:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sldc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id xB4HYLuS007842; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:34:22 -0600
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (mail-green.research.att.com [135.207.255.15]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id xB4HYGh9007664; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:34:17 -0600
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njbdcas1.research.att.com [135.197.255.61]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F77E2707; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 12:30:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from njmtcas1.research.att.com (135.207.255.86) by njbdcas1.research.att.com (135.197.255.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.468.0; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 12:34:15 -0500
Received: from njmtexg5.research.att.com ([fe80::b09c:ff13:4487:78b6]) by njmtcas1.research.att.com ([fe80::e881:676b:51b6:905d%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 12:34:15 -0500
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry@ietf.org>, "ippm-chairs@ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "ietf@wjcerveny.com" <ietf@wjcerveny.com>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-22: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVqg7GB+EfsY1zrkyj56hkkmT3dKeqOzNg
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 17:34:15 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CFA6F05D2F@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
References: <157540083363.24740.938613141509490611.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <157540083363.24740.938613141509490611.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [156.106.224.110]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-04_03:2019-12-04,2019-12-04 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912040141
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/hxKTbmx0PCJss1sxp2CXrnY7ahg>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-22: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 17:34:35 -0000

Hi Roman,

Thanks for your comments, please see replies [acm] below,
Al


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 2:21 PM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry@ietf.org; ippm-chairs@ietf.org;
> ietf@wjcerveny.com; ippm@ietf.org
> Subject: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-
> 22: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-22: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.ietf.org_iesg_statement_discuss-2Dcriteria.html&d=DwICaQ&c=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=MORwxD_LcECgRyQBuRlMWtVH_1SoR
> 7KAnwDUTv1Mesk&s=0r34Ku0pn83Qx8FKp-eLIu0ohbapPTlMBEkLASrHxVY&e=
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dippm-2Dmetric-
> 2Dregistry_&d=DwICaQ&c=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=MORwxD_LcECgRyQBuRlMWtVH_1SoR
> 7KAnwDUTv1Mesk&s=Wgacp35roDGqM8kQleTYzaFL3R55Cwavcyl9WRXtXdU&e=
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> * Section 9.  Please consider adding something approximately along the
> lines of:
> 
> The aggregated results of the performance metrics described in this
> registry
> can reveal network topology information that might be considered
> sensitive.  If
> this is the case, access control mechanism should be applied.
[acm] 
OK, I added a slightly re-worded version in the working draft.

> 
> * Editorial Nits:
> - Section 7.1.2. Typo. s/obervations/ observations/
> - Section 7.1.3. Typo. s/formated/formatted/
> - Section 7.3.1.  Typo. s/unambigious/unambiguous/
> - Section 7.3.2.  Typo. s/wether/whether/
> - Section 7.3.5.  Typo. s/accomodated/accommodated/
> - Section 7.4.4.  Typo. s/calbration/calibration/
> - Section 8.1. Spacing. s/[RFC8126]policy/[RFC8126] policy/
> - Section 8.2.  Typo. s/Regsirty/Registry/
> - Section 8.2. Typo. s/unchamged/unchanged/
> - Section 9.  Typo. s/secuity/security/
> 
[acm] Thanks, all found and fixed.
[acm] I clearly have a keyboard that can't keep up - mostly missing letters...