Re: [ippm] Adoption call for IOAM deployment and integrity documents

"Wangyali(Yali,Data Communication Standards and Patents Dept)" <wangyali11@huawei.com> Thu, 12 August 2021 08:32 UTC

Return-Path: <wangyali11@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD473A3CB5 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IIQDSaraF2k4 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C99263A3CB3 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Glg0354Ffz6GBP7 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 16:31:47 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) by fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:32:25 +0200
Received: from dggpeml500024.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.10) by dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 16:32:23 +0800
Received: from dggpeml500024.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.10]) by dggpeml500024.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.10]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 16:32:23 +0800
From: "Wangyali(Yali,Data Communication Standards and Patents Dept)" <wangyali11@huawei.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Adoption call for IOAM deployment and integrity documents
Thread-Index: AQHXiISxgRBCQI+6QEqVpa0aS7dwcatvln9g
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:32:23 +0000
Message-ID: <9b20b324fad14aa48edc72e44de4c7d9@huawei.com>
References: <69C9F697-A970-41DD-B7EF-0C17204D57AA@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <69C9F697-A970-41DD-B7EF-0C17204D57AA@apple.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.136]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9b20b324fad14aa48edc72e44de4c7d9huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/jNnvooN3GOBq40bcvWpPr3NubjM>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for IOAM deployment and integrity documents
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:32:39 -0000

Hi Tommy and Ian,

Having read these two drafts, which are significant for IOAM implementation and security. I support the adoption of both two drafts.

Best,
Yali

From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tommy Pauly
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 12:29 AM
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] Adoption call for IOAM deployment and integrity documents

Hello IPPM,

As discussed in our meeting last week, we will be starting an adoption call for two IOAM-related documents that have been raised as important dependencies during the IESG review of IOAM-data.

This email begins a Working Group adoption call for two documents:

Integrity of In-situ OAM Data Fields
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-ippm-ioam-data-integrity/
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-brockners-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-03.html

In-situ OAM Deployment
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-opsawg-ioam-deployment/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-brockners-opsawg-ioam-deployment-03

This call will last until Wednesday, August 18. Please reply to this email with your comments, and if you think these documents should be taken on by IPPM.

Best,
Tommy & Ian