Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Thu, 29 September 2022 10:18 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426B8C14F744 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 03:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uh0NqnF-xeNz for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 03:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA72C14CF1F for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 03:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MdTpH27yrz683hj for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 18:18:15 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi100010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.54) by fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:18:22 +0200
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.199) by kwepemi100010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 18:18:20 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) by kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.031; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 18:18:20 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Call for adoption of PM on LAG
Thread-Index: Adi+IfLIHDT5LddtQ/WfPt2JAJ+z9AUZ/RZAAFin1aA=
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 10:18:19 +0000
Message-ID: <a24181980ac74e38bdf5735749839156@huawei.com>
References: <AM0PR07MB4131BFFD304468FA4CCD0484E27B9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <AM0PR07MB4131173E5A6928D8EE190463E2559@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB4131173E5A6928D8EE190463E2559@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.41.183]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a24181980ac74e38bdf5735749839156huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/keI2jQsZynWVW3oQRS7acR_exNE>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 10:18:29 -0000

Hi Marcus,

Thank you and all the contributors.
We will soon revise the document.

Cheers,
Tianran

From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marcus Ihlar
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 12:05 AM
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG

Hello IPPM,
Thanks to everyone who has provided feedback. We see strong support for adopting these documents and will now formally adopt them.
Authors, please consider the feedback you have received in this thread as you work on the next revision.

BR
Marcus

From: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Marcus Ihlar
Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2022 18:44
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>) <ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>>
Subject: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG

Hello IPPM,
This email starts an adoption call in the IPPM working group for the draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag and draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag documents. These documents extend STAMP, OWAMP and TWAMP to support performance measurements on member links of a Link Aggregation Group.

The first draft specifies an extension to STAMP and can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/

The second draft specifies extensions to OWAMP and TWAMP and can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/

Please reply to this email by Thursday September 15, to indicate whether you support adoption of these documents.

BR
Marcus & Tommy