Re: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bis

t petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> Fri, 08 April 2022 08:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfa@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087FA3A17E8 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 01:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zZPDKtc458BU for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 01:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am5eur03on071f.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe08::71f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15D703A17DF for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 01:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=WSkIDgTrJ/CVdGNCQGAmWmhQ59nyr1CqXNySKOKMTGFrbLGVsuGCUX4f4d2mHsTmLyjqByD5z9ci2KdWeo6psfvoRQjE1+bKjUGiR4mAlHMbcy7ESjfsfll5RazJbWbRSj0aM9IimCsYkmSlsRBTN6skXDAk45+yIL2fyi9MUF8SEmWd1zFNt5XeuI6Uviy65/kNF1BtylfmFtgJKjXbg3giTQHLCxuyPp11OgUonlW1wD9RQsmSba2nLh/QetOf0YVPbFnKPO/8UUv4+TQzgJcywqWypCiK0lJ7Nd3yyNw8mxmxs7TJpW+PwN5MSi3hG1R/axWsGa5Mc7iZ4M+opg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=J9+RpXGSqwcvu+hvKbgA+KullcFe5VD1ea/e4ACTk9Y=; b=KW1o+Nw0XDxPTN3IEDq0DUBX5J5q9wPiKmRgq6I+u/colTnbRJUeMveDqFDCzNTsIuZVwSQQyKT75b4IE7R5GcVz8SD1+gcsuYxvlpVqyVxaZ3y67VTMWRPlRvtqAuAQkVYO1KioBbNR3dhjTJdUkVYvyoLrOqrg5pe7V7sLdIsRplB4/ag8m66O6r/3FFFkpBsQM45qnD8/5qOJNYJt3C+atOxHDDyEsE4YRzueZNP9+7F1NzXxQLsIACKAXay/ikSjMQpXcQuDWPiyoscHzkk2hMjRp0WXzowyWdoRtYkUFpd1RI6cDqXNbty5ktezgWkyQ9Zl50II0g6eFVZ1yw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=J9+RpXGSqwcvu+hvKbgA+KullcFe5VD1ea/e4ACTk9Y=; b=dZ9oE+gN8mi75xjqG4frh0kPtTM03CGAhIaE+x1U6A2cMed04Fyu1RviUtFyNkehBmUgE3s/fZsE4NkBF8m1JvPC6pzB4XVcqqtocIng/Jk5WLJPO6cTyUCaJUk/xB+mgy8AYCzmuqz+Qdt7EzKqbkmyho0kCy7e7woOc4Q6sIg=
Authentication-Results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
Received: from DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:73::23) by AS4PR07MB8659.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:4ce::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5144.19; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 08:42:51 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::fc74:2a30:a504:169a]) by DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::fc74:2a30:a504:169a%5]) with mapi id 15.20.5164.008; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 08:42:51 +0000
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
References: <CAM4esxQHrH7onttT6MV+DGuM24cQW99pZ83wOAK_88BcAP43Rw@mail.gmail.com> <17AA8D9D-CDEC-4CF3-938A-4280CE08A51A@apple.com>
From: t petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Message-ID: <624FF58D.1050407@btconnect.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 09:42:53 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
In-Reply-To: <17AA8D9D-CDEC-4CF3-938A-4280CE08A51A@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ClientProxiedBy: LO2P265CA0509.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:13b::16) To DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:73::23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 15e2383d-7532-4c80-e310-08da193bc412
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AS4PR07MB8659:EE_
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <AS4PR07MB8659CB085302A9353E6A0E8EA2E99@AS4PR07MB8659.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230001)(366004)(66476007)(86362001)(82960400001)(87266011)(36756003)(53546011)(966005)(33656002)(316002)(38350700002)(38100700002)(8676002)(110136005)(66946007)(66556008)(2616005)(6512007)(6486002)(8936002)(5660300002)(186003)(508600001)(52116002)(6506007)(2906002)(26005)(83380400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?Windows-1252?Q?m7uYcfBsWvmmLx2roGL50scKUWh3EfGwHp5jMRCwAmTxCFj6fk7pkQOY?= =?Windows-1252?Q?tgta2PcI6pswMXZkCN3ywHeXXJdy+aFYc/XOlfQgnH4y5uqnBEWT2SGL?= =?Windows-1252?Q?+dcv2SyAjjTsI6XIJlMSMaVc3Xm3FF6jM/4fdI/TMPtLcxL5kDLGo0kf?= =?Windows-1252?Q?Qlzli/jAipqIli1BPaL4wlcZgi/66+HrCZiO5zSOmXKuNeRIEz+2M40x?= =?Windows-1252?Q?ZJvVDEaQ6AF7ephLU3pZcbU2DAQdyoOB06ncnl2/uXfFENcK4lZvbW0I?= =?Windows-1252?Q?+Gn4HwnfiZIxc2BRnMpwhuGOv78dGaqFgjtrWYbptlr9zodZsc5O5kqJ?= =?Windows-1252?Q?viVLkviv3iJUQBGNv0KXC35gDu6bNChk6wPGVRYLpuxdzKveuEyn1r/+?= =?Windows-1252?Q?b1b+qPPgkF1kKzcWN5sRQLxx0xnhpkyNmbAYwLZoQukkCnKQwchwlENx?= =?Windows-1252?Q?hlO3s6icLM2k4wKVrD6NFTVkMJK/8w/ek8teoyAQjgOARNxIq9sTVDJ4?= =?Windows-1252?Q?SSVoW1OajRIMsGnYwY8hGbnhiCJvPQgCHH/kQvF0BFwNQewzyF6uKAVy?= =?Windows-1252?Q?26qp3cGOeWXGsx7YGur/SU5qjvko9iHGztc6drSZ2HJNndSaDivqdIhX?= =?Windows-1252?Q?Bqo2g52U4UiHAuRHzHZbU1NCIC0KLbpXfoEsSfhWTvPzqQAGPlYmRLhQ?= =?Windows-1252?Q?NeCmVf5kxpqX5Iw4P1IRltgdnAmWS77ANXqop3CsCNsnrsXto7z1ImxS?= =?Windows-1252?Q?lc7zGvDoXHXfiCiPPDipJcATNvRbTz60ENi37A7Km3Egq+g/xAnTBL1L?= =?Windows-1252?Q?3usTHd7okbI69NtlZVi8yR+TtKJKE1IwF4Prw/bCoCBnUvGMAS3nP9aO?= =?Windows-1252?Q?rti95DnIM5fmX2rxDQiTVkHN6nfTgzXvAHkyZGrIXBIlVsMjyO0FkvY9?= =?Windows-1252?Q?Oxy2cAG1Pjl3Krv237eucO0e+0+ozHTIlPLxAfe0pJoA5fP1UP0Xaz8n?= =?Windows-1252?Q?JZkZCd2+wEJqwM8Fr8PegmiQRD137Tt1+swaE5tpLBVZRUY2D8Tv71D6?= =?Windows-1252?Q?+c93ACxt25zoSNU7uKVywMW+wC3gfuetlZYW2UapbE24x9MGk7TlsrDz?= =?Windows-1252?Q?6FDvEZZwe4lOCIUwINuUdxVoZsaYZ87OHvyzCaz7fcg+qcrUMzrQtCx5?= =?Windows-1252?Q?iEA8M6dR5c1JRR3LHKlENWmbXPk2M834lqpjysAPn5B2aa6tyKcAU2PN?= =?Windows-1252?Q?G1neEZKsDVlzArTkoYBWjtpML4b+zCb7x++ikfgDwiWNOh4oZD9NveKf?= =?Windows-1252?Q?2ugR8S7eXQAcedF6SvHKKS0DX24p2YKY1BdfwUmTQP8r0rqMwLsIHfVW?= =?Windows-1252?Q?H9qpscpJ78WfQk8CKmMCf5UZC+yhos5kby6xuOSsUZHqKI5a7Kl6PgeM?= =?Windows-1252?Q?J2aqFBa8D+7FiTuH2TsRmx1nGFWm1EX6WdF7ORi9Co4j5RC01D/96DGK?= =?Windows-1252?Q?+qRomOrAlPk8SALUFbhKykNU96O6RkiBsFmGTTz9feVCIg992Yb8NFhl?= =?Windows-1252?Q?GVw5UZ2MImXRFx+chiOiXIZhPJSwsLtU33YSJjbKpetLB9zICufIsU4i?= =?Windows-1252?Q?hfPJkr5rGX4KT3hgpfjzHCdRaVL9tt7ECdd0NgJFfpsFgrEOHcw2V4ZR?= =?Windows-1252?Q?TEE91YIMMuIXiRQ+kx4OZlmZ+C9sKYaLSPKYGy78FszdNNBNV3g9+LQ7?= =?Windows-1252?Q?22iOMWnGUBpTVFrTJfRM1fVEalT8t3hXCmXHPoMIPNEiK3euRHBloaOp?= =?Windows-1252?Q?5XghMYfwLK4diepzGZu2mOTkT4xTpqOLrdxK28z1npGieIIhLxd72jG9?= =?Windows-1252?Q?4hGgLozVmBkCQQ=3D=3D?=
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 15e2383d-7532-4c80-e310-08da193bc412
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2022 08:42:51.0933 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: 6knTa+iIYZqcr5xeguaNF4TJCG6spum0fEyIYjc9kcK0pK62ZcePRZeDoLVCfb491WWFoZiEXjZonDboa+5vBA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AS4PR07MB8659
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/lO7kQk1ReJ6n9ayXsiOgnP5IZEQ>
Subject: Re: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bis
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 08:43:01 -0000

On 08/04/2022 01:03, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> Hello IPPM,
>
> This email starts an adoption call for draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis and draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis. Please see Martin’s emails below for details — the main idea here is that we’re moving two IPPM RFCs from Experimental to Proposed Standard.
>
> The chairs would like to have a short amount of time spent in the WG processing these documents. If we adopt, we’d plan to very shortly thereafter do a working group last call.
>
> Please reply to this email by Thursday, April 21 and indicate if you support adopting this document.

'this document'
Which document?

Please post subsequent e-mails about one I-D only with the subject line 
indicating which, else I will get confused (and may well confuse others 
with my comments).

Tom Petch

> Best,
> Tommy & Marcus
>
>> On Apr 7, 2022, at 1:16 PM, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello IPPM,
>>
>> You may recall that there was a need to progress RFC8321 and RFC8889 from Experimental to Proposed Standard. There was a feeling that the update would be trivial and we could therefore do it as an AD sponsored document.
>>
>> I've done 3 rounds of AD review and I've seen the need to substantially adjust the scope of these documents and tweak the design in places. The changes are not revolutionary, but I'm a non-practitioner and have driven some design changes with minimal review. At this point I think it's important to get good IPPM review; if we're going to do that anyway, we might as well do the (expedited) working group process so that there's no confusion as to why IPPM didn't formally review an update to its own documents.
>>
>> So, as first step, I invite the working group to adopt these two drafts:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis/>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis/>
>> Any objections to adoption, as always, should be to the value of doing the work at all, and the general direction of the drafts. I hope to follow up the adoption call with an immediate WGLC to shake out any detailed objections, though we will take as long as we need to address concerns that people have.
>>
>> I invite you to consult the changelogs on both of these documents, which are not long, to get a sense of what we've done.
>>
>> For those of you who like diffs, there was a big reorganization between draft-02 and -03 that is hard to follow in a diff. So here is a set of diffs that exclude the -02 to -03 transition:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc8321.txt&url2=draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis-02.txt <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc8321.txt&url2=draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis-02.txt>
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis-03.txt&url2=draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis-04.txt <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis-03.txt&url2=draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis-04.txt>
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc8889.txt&url2=draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis-02.txt <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc8889.txt&url2=draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis-02.txt>
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis-03.txt&url2=draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis-04.txt <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis-03.txt&url2=draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis-04.txt>
>>
>> I believe it's up to the chairs to start the adoption call. If people are good about reading the document during WGLC, I would like to think we could be done before IETF 114.
>>
>> Your friendly Area Director,
>> Martin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ippm mailing list
>> ippm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>