[ippm] RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis: new versions

Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Tue, 05 April 2022 08:39 UTC

Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67F33A1AE7; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 01:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sQYb6YpKR3pb; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 01:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA0543A1ADB; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 01:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4KXgy95GRbz68880; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 16:37:53 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) by fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:39:37 +0200
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:39:37 +0200
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis.all@ietf.org>, "draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis: new versions
Thread-Index: AdhIyJGMb+Dhtk6ESOqUwPfmeovNPw==
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 08:39:37 +0000
Message-ID: <3c294b5f687f402298f05055c9d15a3f@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.48.202.230]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3c294b5f687f402298f05055c9d15a3fhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/lcch9yjC-da9LCzHGdDKX0HdIJo>
Subject: [ippm] RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis: new versions
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 08:39:45 -0000

Dear Martin, All,
Please note that I just submitted new revisions of RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis.
I tried to address the latest AD reviews.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis/

Comments and suggestions are always welcome.

Best Regards,

Giuseppe