Re: [ippm] IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and IOAM flags updates
Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 19:28 UTC
Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334001208A6 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l8xvfgKLhzaA for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72CB1208CA for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 9DBDDBCF328286445C83 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 20:27:55 +0100 (IST)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 20:27:54 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.142]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 03:27:47 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <fbrockne@cisco.com>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and IOAM flags updates
Thread-Index: AdVAemjOpbipKdShRhO+PDmA6kDyjwAPU8xqAAc+p5AAI8p6ewABWlGgAAhrUZc=
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:27:47 +0000
Message-ID: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BEED1A73@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <BYAPR11MB2584C1B270C11A39441F6354DAC40@BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BEECD2E7@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>, <BYAPR11MB258489B22F32610A3C02A5F9DAC40@BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BEECFFFF@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>, <BYAPR11MB25847B7A6F3C74AB01E1D5B8DAC70@BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB25847B7A6F3C74AB01E1D5B8DAC70@BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.124.93.69]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BEED1A73NKGEML515MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/ldbATnRjU0Aw9TjJtVF2gLvkjbc>
Subject: Re: [ippm] IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and IOAM flags updates
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:28:01 -0000
Hi Frank, A new dedicated document makes sense. We can spin out the new IOAM option specification from draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry. Then draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry could be general, informative to describe the PBT method. Cheers, Tianran ________________________________ ·¢¼þÈË: Frank Brockners (fbrockne) [fbrockne@cisco.com] ·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2019Äê7ÔÂ23ÈÕ 23:24 ÊÕ¼þÈË: Tianran Zhou; ippm@ietf.org Ö÷Ìâ: RE: IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and IOAM flags updates Hi Tianran, Thanks. IMHO we need an IOAM-focused small and concise spec for Immediate-Export ¨C this can either be done within draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data or in a dedicated document which would extend draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data, much like draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags for flags. A dedicated document might allow us to finish up draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data faster ¨C which might be a reason why we¡¯d want a dedicated document. If you refer to draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-04 as ¡°PBT draft¡± below: This document isn¡¯t focused on IOAM and thus is not a good fit. This doc is rather a bit all over the map, it discusses challenges for INT, which isn¡¯t an IETF protocol, it proposed new headers unrelated to IOAM, etc. Cheers, Frank From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Sent: Dienstag, 23. Juli 2019 10:47 To: Frank Brockners (fbrockne) <fbrockne@cisco.com>; ippm@ietf.org Subject: RE: IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and IOAM flags updates Hi Frank, Thanks. I think we are now aligned on the new option now. With regard to the place, I think we can just evolve the existing PBT draft. Cheers, Tianran ________________________________ ·¢¼þÈË: Frank Brockners (fbrockne) [fbrockne@cisco.com] ·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2019Äê7ÔÂ23ÈÕ 5:41 ÊÕ¼þÈË: Tianran Zhou; ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org> Ö÷Ìâ: RE: IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and IOAM flags updates Hi Tianran, IMHO this sounds like a workable path forward, i.e. we¡¯d consolidate things into a new IOAM option for Immediate-Export/PBT, avoid the ¡°I-Flag¡± and describe actions (e.g. log/forward-a-copy/count/..) per the earlier discussion. We can discuss this in the IPPM WG meeting as part of the IOAM update slot. Where would we best specify this new option? We could either write a new dedicated document for this new IOAM option (borrowing pieces from draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-04), or fold it into the existing IOAM data fields draft. Does the WG have a preference? Thanks, Frank From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com<mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>> Sent: Montag, 22. Juli 2019 14:16 To: Frank Brockners (fbrockne) <fbrockne@cisco.com<mailto:fbrockne@cisco.com>>; ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org> Subject: Re: IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and IOAM flags updates Hi Frank, I think according to the side meeting in Prague, most of us believed an independent postcard option is better than the using of immediate export flag. And draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-04 has closed the discussion on flow id and sequence number by setting them optional. Here are some of my thoughts: - IOAM already has incremental tracing option and pre-allocated tracing option based on the way to operate metadata. Both have clear Semantics on operating metadata. It reasonable to use another option for PBT. - Hardware is easy to realize the next step process by parsing the option type, without further flag matching. - A new option will enable the extensibility for PBT related data fields. E.g., actions as proposed in the mailing list What's your thoughts? Thanks, Tianran ________________________________ ·¢¼þÈË: ippm [ippm-bounces@ietf.org] ´ú±í Frank Brockners (fbrockne) [fbrockne@cisco.com] ·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2019Äê7ÔÂ22ÈÕ 18:44 ÊÕ¼þÈË: ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org> Ö÷Ìâ: [ippm] IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and IOAM flags updates Hi IOAM enthusiasts, I¡¯ve started to craft slides for the IOAM update in the IPPM WG meeting on Wednesday. Here is what I¡¯ve assembled for covering draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06 and draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags-00: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nSbwvwWlexQ9Ns5VbtWavY9BQMpKT1RgjvCPGpwQFAw/ Appreciate your thoughts and comments. Thanks, Frank
- [ippm] IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and IOAM … Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [ippm] IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and I… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [ippm] IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and I… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [ippm] IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and I… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [ippm] IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and I… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [ippm] IPPM slides for IOAM data fields and I… Tianran Zhou