[ippm] samknows reports 853 ms of latency under load for US DSL.

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Fri, 26 August 2022 07:54 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA470C1526F0 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X-5--uvDi0X0 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC0A1C1522A9 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id k9so869113wri.0 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=WhJ0JS16I7XM5ztcmv/hp0B3aO3TZQxaVz2nWnoZ1AE=; b=KaW5LWSJR79+S1IHkFbYrTqC+ptLwFWlTccZTIWBuNGKPFYwDfo6tKOpaAxCDU/wru rfcM8hZRIbYNfCkvGXSBmKfFHCGMwx2m9DxhK8uLO8CUuzlTVmFQN5TshZma6LYzuaoD 98yZPZrQ5l2uw6XlDGmMkW8pB4/9Swj6v5PFzz+AFwzw5X0+fz/XNKV3dMtaML5H0h+A oRZ/VWMi602NDp/Jk9rwJvN8jdUu0esosY2aGVQ2re1y10UvTowiB+UWUk5unj6lXI0L PAdvZBEdEhHu0JzTXgP0P07g50Wq1hHXoIg0uvXDxyADci0IbxMhtXgFdUCEiFULQ3Jl WWyQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=WhJ0JS16I7XM5ztcmv/hp0B3aO3TZQxaVz2nWnoZ1AE=; b=nAzk9vWEHzMvelBEVexNl//CkhR/ItN+NVZJjUiwnOaGJ7wM7tcKFdX3fwi8LGb4pT cm57p/33vVc/VVB16wCuI1mpkDRB57sT3iBZ99UDU64Oepkt3Bce4USy9dpvrvTDGk5Y 1KMegbtJ5nzdO+/T8W34ncYsp5ZZE0Il7q9/excWfn52djfkhpDBek1lyT70NcPiuy5j OYxe0jqTARX8CDqEcAy5VfeqVrRGnGnwoJPMDI8Wl64O12E4mxWtGcJWV1k8gDrX4KdM Po9Pk7Utdh7YR0CYmhSOuZFc1BOrukpSwTteAZm44rVq9bC9D3L+9Pt2e/fyMjM0D6xV iyXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3ZE8saRQAwG200PD3Kd2Evk3frVRCug16sjJWfGDy55yaUSCjS XmT/4NyNqnEdYs3lF8e6eU0U2JgMEShABBQtWU4GCQzZ1Qw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6nMsVjkt2qqXOJIq3Io5VVHt5K7FL/hOn5ZUk1OfgLzEtQOw2ak6JHokWLM3UB/jyg4QnKbuhzodVMQD29qX4=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4302:0:b0:225:5303:39e5 with SMTP id h2-20020a5d4302000000b00225530339e5mr4246657wrq.380.1661500480559; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:54:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7GgbXdbDta6L+TMO5QGn-_7XbGeSEvHRkM=12iDUH_qw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Measurement Analysis and Tools Working Group <mat-wg@ripe.net>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/mIY_LwfJCsi-iV_7OAPY3UeSq08>
Subject: [ippm] samknows reports 853 ms of latency under load for US DSL.
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:54:47 -0000

US DSL, according to their measurements, has 853 ms of latency under
load, as reported to the FCC.
pretty good podcast and blog at: https://samknows.com/blog/bufferbloat
- where they also discuss their current and planned methods of
measurement.

Also, speedtest.net is finally reporting on "working latency", and
their new speedtest apps showing it to the user.
https://www.ookla.com/articles/introducing-loaded-latency

It would be really great if y'all could join in on helping us finally
solve the bufferbloat problem internet wide.

-- 
FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC