[ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8912 (6758)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 28 November 2021 08:39 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1482B3A0975 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:39:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YAxpu_ElGYP4 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C7B93A096E for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 8FC65622CF1; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:39:33 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: nmalykh@ieee.org, acmorton@att.com, marcelo@it.uc3m.es, philip.eardley@bt.com, kld@att.com, ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20211128083933.8FC65622CF1@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:39:33 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/nat5Pwekfj7bKztiosOGjrksG8s>
Subject: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8912 (6758)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 08:39:39 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8912, "Initial Performance Metrics Registry Entries". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6758 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@ieee.org> Section: 4.4.2 Original Text ------------- Percent_LossRatio: The numeric value of the result is expressed in units of lost packets to total packets times 100%, as a positive value of type decimal64 with fraction digits = 9 (see Section 9.3 of [RFC6020]) with a resolution of 0.0000000001. Corrected Text -------------- Percent_LossRatio: The numeric value of the result is expressed in units of lost packets to total packets times 100%, as a positive value of type decimal64 with fraction digits = 9 (see Section 9.3 of [RFC6020]) with a resolution of 0.000000001. Notes ----- An extra 0 in the value of the resolution of the loss ratio. The error is repeated in sections 7.4.2.6, 8.4.2.6, 9.4.2.4 Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8912 (draft-ietf-ippm-initial-registry-16) -------------------------------------- Title : Initial Performance Metrics Registry Entries Publication Date : November 2021 Author(s) : A. Morton, M. Bagnulo, P. Eardley, K. D'Souza Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Performance Measurement Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8912 (6758) RFC Errata System
- Re: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8912 (6… MORTON JR., AL
- Re: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8912 (6… Martin Duke
- Re: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8912 (6… MORTON JR., AL
- Re: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8912 (6… Martin Duke