[ippm] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-12: (with COMMENT)

Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 24 March 2021 01:27 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9FD3A1C77; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 18:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data@ietf.org, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, Al Morton <acm@research.att.com>, acm@research.att.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.27.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <161654925329.29254.3776182308241345045@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 18:27:33 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/odslk6GqPGwtgSunTsf8kJuJYaI>
Subject: [ippm] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 01:27:33 -0000

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[ section 5.4 ]

* "deployed in a particular IOAM," -> "deployed in a particular IOAM-Domain,"
  perhaps

* I think perhaps it should be made clear, especially for the Incremental
  Trace Option, that dynamic insertion of data might need to be moderated
  "subject to any protocol constraints of the encapsulating layer", as it
  were.