Re: [ippm] IPPM adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts

I want to thank everyone who took part in the WG AP, shared their comments
and suggestions. Will update the draft shortly.

Thank you, Tommy. I uploaded the draft-ietf-ippm-assymetrical-pkts-00
version without any changes other than the title of the document. We will
work on updating the draft based on the comments received in the course of
the WG AP.

Regards,
Greg (on behalf of the authors)

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 8:55 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Thanks to those who provided feedback on this adoption call! It looks like
> we do have consensus to adopt this document in IPPM.
>
> Several useful issues were brought up during the adoption call, so I’d
> like to ask the authors to incorporate revisions based on the discussion in
> the ietf-00 version of the draft.
>
> Best,
> Tommy & Marcus
>
> On Apr 9, 2024, at 9:27 AM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hello IPPM,
>
> This email starts an adoption call
> for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts. This is a document we’ve discussed
> several times, and is a normative dependency for another document we
> discussed adopting at IETF 119, draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr.
>
> You can find the draft here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts/
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-04.html#name-reflected-test-packet-control
>
> Please review the draft and respond to this email to indicate if you think
> IPPM should adopt this document as a working group item.
>
> This call will last for 3 weeks. Please reply by *Tuesday, April 30*.
>
> Best,
> Tommy & Marcus
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>