[ippm] Follow up on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity
Alex Huang Feng <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr> Wed, 29 March 2023 08:42 UTC
Return-Path: <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31243C15155C for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 01:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.232
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH=2.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Wt9AADvArfk for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 01:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpout02-ext4.partage.renater.fr (smtpout02-ext4.partage.renater.fr [194.254.241.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2CDFC151555 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 01:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmtaauth04.partage.renater.fr (zmtaauth04.partage.renater.fr [194.254.241.26]) by smtpout20.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27709BFB33 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:42:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zmtaauth04.partage.renater.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaauth04.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C66C1C0845 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:01:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaauth04.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EE01C084D for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:01:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zmtaauth04.partage.renater.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmtaauth04.partage.renater.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id a3ygb7_UJVPH for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:01:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 133.159.153.166 (unknown [194.254.241.251]) by zmtaauth04.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6D1431C0845 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:01:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Alex Huang Feng <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.2\))
Message-Id: <0FC5A64B-0515-4826-A617-4D184A7FAB6C@insa-lyon.fr>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:00:58 +0200
To: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.2)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at clamav02
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamState: clean
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamScore: 0
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdehhedguddvkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucftgffptefvgfftnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephfgtgfgguffkfffvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomheptehlvgigucfjuhgrnhhgucfhvghnghcuoegrlhgvgidrhhhurghnghdqfhgvnhhgsehinhhsrgdqlhihohhnrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueetiefgleeguddvgfduffefteefudekueetgeehleduvdeiudelveegudfhudffnecukfhppeduleegrddvheegrddvgedurddvhedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepudelgedrvdehgedrvdeguddrvdehuddphhgvlhhopedufeefrdduheelrdduheefrdduieeipdhmrghilhhfrhhomheptehlvgigucfjuhgrnhhgucfhvghnghcuoegrlhgvgidrhhhurghnghdqfhgvnhhgsehinhhsrgdqlhihohhnrdhfrheqpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtohepihhpphhmsehivghtfhdrohhrgh
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/pj9TWxjDA_swTqFglpm5kqAQWOg>
Subject: [ippm] Follow up on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 08:42:13 -0000
Dear IPPM, Following up on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity, I talked to Justin directly but only wanted to give my opinion also here. I like the idea of having the IOAM header as part of the signature (of course, the static part as Justin proposed in the meeting on Monday). About the IOAM DEX in the draft, I am supportive of adding it since it is very similar to IOAM E2E and I think it is useful. Cheers, Alex
- [ippm] Follow up on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-int… Alex Huang Feng