[ippm] Heads up on draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 29 April 2022 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0992C14F74A for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qlO2mmc2IWhM for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6D4CC14F74B for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 23TLlp4o009031 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:47:51 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08B64604B for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:47:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B549A46048 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:47:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:47:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (229.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.229] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 23TLlner005478 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:47:51 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'IETF IPPM WG' <ippm@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:47:49 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <09bc01d85c12$c6906c30$53b14490$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdhcEhxsO8Bp9IaNTuifvHKkFFWduA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.229
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-26864.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--6.429-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--6.429-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-26864.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--6.429000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: Vag+r/h5ShQOwAmmWH5kBKJVTu7sjgg1sXm0OsXi/nWu9yzHHu0ZiUIj Ip4EpSqC3Di7MzW6oyHlFj6daGmOeoXWZSIKVRR3ngIgpj8eDcC063Wh9WVqgnXA+T8YcZkD77V HPahGIGcNXwNUB3oA790H8LFZNFG7bkV4e2xSge4zeXY2sGV0bzrE0DFtupKwbCPA2X5XDpENMf d6DnWjfgkrYwrjkf4Y
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/q-pFkI6I8SxkKExVngspmBvbNfc>
Subject: [ippm] Heads up on draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:47:57 -0000

Hi,

I'm the document shepherd for draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm. It has
completed WG last call in the OPSAWG.

The work may be of interest to IPPM and you might want to watch out for the
IETF last call which will be along in due course.

But I'm sure that the authors would welcome any comments you have at any
time.

Best,
Adrian