Re: [ippm] WGLC for RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Thu, 05 May 2022 00:57 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B23C14F74A for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2022 17:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6mQ8MINIRv1l for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2022 17:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1C1C14F736 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 May 2022 17:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml705-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4KtwFt0Jpjz67yKG for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 May 2022 08:54:42 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi500010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.191) by fraeml705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 5 May 2022 02:57:49 +0200
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.199) by kwepemi500010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.191) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 5 May 2022 08:57:47 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) by kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Thu, 5 May 2022 08:57:47 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] WGLC for RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis
Thread-Index: AQHYW0XwWjKZeTsBRUSqqI4h6wJuXq0Pf2BQ
Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 00:57:47 +0000
Message-ID: <83b2cacd56724706b7d1883ff81d0a85@huawei.com>
References: <D1D85EBC-466F-49C9-80BE-60616DC79771@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <D1D85EBC-466F-49C9-80BE-60616DC79771@apple.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.195]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_83b2cacd56724706b7d1883ff81d0a85huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/q7gVWe4xnZkBryChEXltIxaMb7E>
Subject: Re: [ippm] WGLC for RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 00:57:57 -0000

Hi WG,

I support the publication of these two drafts as coauthor.

Best,
Tianran

From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tommy Pauly
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2022 5:20 AM
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] WGLC for RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis

Hello IPPM,

This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8321bis and draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis. As a reminder, these are documents that are being revised as they move from being experimental to standards-track, for which we are running an accelerated process.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8321bis/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis/

Please provide feedback and reviews by replying to this email by Friday, May 13. Please also indicate if you think this document is ready to progress.

Best,
Tommy & Marcus