Re: [ippm] IPR Call regarding draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark

Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com> Thu, 03 August 2017 06:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0DF132225; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 23:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SwKm5akGHmIN; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 23:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE4F11321FD; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 23:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id t201so6520119wmt.0; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 23:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LTrg9+RdTRTv9EDykMuvieduxRTGLaPQtBXxC385OTo=; b=jKMbMVURN57+ItYdxt9iftmaB5sQL1er0sJImlkwKFm955Z7Cfa82QSvqgK9OOjT6h cO7HosNV7j7E9zrAaw6T00B0EJg9WgyubZgvofjq0us6rR5RuzWtRMvu9KtAMS1TfLBk a/2nDjmBHYjQlDnN9gzAsnErdfZoC5DJ5uFg+9MCuNrdKA8JgDNi/OGRzKy7KhKro3k+ 7YoiAVATRYGqIJYBoOPZCPE9W1ULagkl+pZ8IYxInJ+7zgzGrJ4YwTTDCgnNNpeRgvh+ 8la7VK7pOStqpQlpOUeBuGICadkDGz2wgDsCd+OtcKMmdQt/QLxtRNOpZLPEODGEd+TS sucw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LTrg9+RdTRTv9EDykMuvieduxRTGLaPQtBXxC385OTo=; b=CbZ1qUFZzdLAWj0rTLhgCmmGDIXaOpY2NlXO5v0/rtN/hIymjG5MGFYn/VaTfCGVyX UH6kJ2m2r63XlA49ejK149/8IWQYntXzqn+VAbLuXVk6yki+DVApwbgL6t/OSyJzXLy2 N+16p+UGU3oHs6zWw4Mz7qKMYc1A8wlG+bNIgKeb3foHyxHfOtDxrDQtkXXFflqRYaD9 DfARGfI0zOmTIA8q/IlHxRWBQLpOYC+Xy/p/1VFgR7hyC16jaPivVnkg3lX4YG52xwcu Y7IX8fNd2i89rxGTZm6Mq0l3aBXeFiR4lsr7VYEsXCd9j9mtZxxEfCIwCILYfktKweFt BRlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113fPCgoeBmonjTqR0Sykvw/ZLWE/l7rnMD6aLcOSAm5KciPf5J5 ylzy9GTa7KJXRAFX+st6ABOOdfhA2A==
X-Received: by 10.80.139.65 with SMTP id l59mr804448edl.52.1501741596340; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 23:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.170.13 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 23:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ED9E6D07-FFCF-4756-A2D8-58CC859B8D4E@cisco.com>
References: <ED9E6D07-FFCF-4756-A2D8-58CC859B8D4E@cisco.com>
From: Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 09:26:36 +0300
Message-ID: <CABUE3XkBM2Xpxi9b8exKuu6CjMZRSjg_qenw1u_oAuqt6vayVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c194a0664f5d70555d376d2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/qp3wVl-cKicByleCWJ7oT70tBvM>
Subject: Re: [ippm] IPR Call regarding draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 06:26:40 -0000

Hi,

I am not aware of any IPRs related to this draft beyond the ones already
reported.

Cheers,
Tal.

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <
cpignata@cisco.com> wrote:

> Dear IPPM,
>
> This email starts an IPR call on draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-06, in
> preparation to document advancement.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-06?
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see
> RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There is one IPR disclosure filed directly against this
> draft-tempia-ippm-p3m:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2557/
>
> _Action_:
>
> If you are listed as a document author, editor, or contributor please
> respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant IPR. These responses are needed for the shepherd questionnaire.
>
> If you are on the IPPM WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> This poll will run for a week, or until all contributors respond.
>
> Thanks!
>
> —
> Carlos Pignataro, carlos@cisco.com
>
> *“Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself
> sound more photosynthesis."*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
>