Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags

"Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)" <shwethab@cisco.com> Tue, 06 August 2019 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <shwethab@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E02C120094; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 17:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=mYB5uQ5D; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=Y4QhBEwv
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kB35N7lqGqO4; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 17:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54F2D120091; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 17:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8815; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1565050599; x=1566260199; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=EWq2mSrrM3qN0HcFfPglY13s9MwsoOtQNJ1aB5hImyw=; b=mYB5uQ5DF2r1JSyB0R485qB1jSaOsQ1R8WcA3uIFBCQHzVqmRInWCSGq 6yRoVgtErKR9iuTgGEXYdmOuRXqffxkssMz2qEs+8U0+aT+x1fxHQdfTG +ig3Zg0zZssu4YTxHWvy7IhsI338DNKRRdJzoCzpSlYzPX2ojMVwb59oe k=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:VmT6QxO7s+9rhy93rH0l6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEu6w/l0fHCIPc7f8My/HbtaztQyQh2d6AqzhDFf4ETBoZkYMTlg0kDtSCDBjgLOHncywzFuxJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AGAAASxkhd/5tdJa1mGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUwQBAQEBAQsBgRUvJCwDbVUgBAsqhB6DRwOEUoZcgluJV4krhFeBLhSBEANUCQEBAQwBARgBCgoCAQGEPwIXglgjNAkOAQQBAQQBAQIBBm2FJwyFSgEBAQMBAQEQCwYdAQEsCwEECwIBCBgjBAMCAgIfBgsUEQIEDgUigwABgR1NAw4PAQ6gYgKBOIhgcYEygnoBAQWFDw0LghMDBoE0AYtiF4FAP4ERJx+CTD6CGkcBAYEpZYJeMoImjwmFBIh1jWJACQKCG5Ang3cbgi+HLI5OjGYJggyIHI4gAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFQOIFYcBU7KgGCQYJCN4M6hRSFP3KBKYxfAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,350,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="610133820"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 Aug 2019 00:16:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x760Gbvc023998 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 6 Aug 2019 00:16:38 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 19:16:37 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 20:16:36 -0400
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 19:16:36 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Yw3FKrYNah83Os+JVU0OjYur2v2JiDtqzpbmhJqd2DGXS9GodkJDMxoVUhWzW47QwDwoScFHbbsvtKDe8t3K9MxKukqqNMvTMUGCfok8TKJJO7kbA389u07mCWRJmxe6/nbs0GsR4Ewfb2zLHEN4+qrVQik/zkSQMa2hTGiiEXvYvWIk+Xe8nhjU52+e05ECLI+Dv13fenVa6382kDYtV30qP7zU6wrtbqXYsZhiBS0dWZjR85Es6XZB+Z8WCX14oGQTNtQH8aJdkNJPde53z5URiLzF0u71NA/zVLqLY3Az2CCtpnJiAnvteUnA/20i1vlZkI5BMFG6sNZujTSxrQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EWq2mSrrM3qN0HcFfPglY13s9MwsoOtQNJ1aB5hImyw=; b=SX4EUOAUL0rdCxlFnJICmUTYPEY3x4DuxkzoMpMYMFtEFix06ZS5pXAz9slXBU5t/9D0kTmYAoHpn+bJgv9dmhrIm5ayNFWBWDz/DdY5AthhwepQFADlnt5iYxsom6mVRyhly3OHNb6IfLrqEPpQRPxQpgzYOo2fAwrb1rcyIV8h3vzdbVfsYvtL1nZhkSGD478QnZM9Iopwp/zlZyywRuRfy8P1HcI9mtYpFzHk1RsSEewpCGAu5dzbDM4OmpJzV4eD22gSl7IQ4lXH6xSkBwaa1Dk+THzBjxyQJAd2pcJ/qBm0YEUJwWDRxFZgZZT+mMOMfMXiff1DA42D5GMVbg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com;dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com;arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EWq2mSrrM3qN0HcFfPglY13s9MwsoOtQNJ1aB5hImyw=; b=Y4QhBEwvg2WSFjQKKzHRfnO2C17UsRVBLucIA/i6+F3qlvgfKeB6Xfjh4+rlneBN1na/CHqWLde4c07XskWyAaetdSjk2itdIxF1bCdOfEm+CAP7gD2BB+Bgqud/pcCQrYX7+VH5v0xkNpn4aY3qOaKEiBGrT2bNo4gKn99/BcI=
Received: from CY4PR11MB0054.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.171.254.155) by CY4PR11MB0071.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.171.254.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2136.16; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 00:16:35 +0000
Received: from CY4PR11MB0054.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d53:2b63:ee4d:f621]) by CY4PR11MB0054.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d53:2b63:ee4d:f621%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2115.005; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 00:16:35 +0000
From: "Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)" <shwethab@cisco.com>
To: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
CC: IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
Thread-Index: AQHVQxPfzWZSQWqHqk+fu0bAmUy66absz3aAgADe/YA=
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:16:34 +0000
Message-ID: <76AEA799-CE6F-476E-988A-CB245CFBC19A@cisco.com>
References: <CA+RyBmVnkMFEQv=Hr3y9OD09+_vocHRgnGQnLwEVO=yuTcptEQ@mail.gmail.com> <EAB5C70D-A160-423E-84FE-3CE7AC079168@trammell.ch> <CACYmcDp_KAxcpXVEKQf5KhEs4r0MnqFQV6JaRKDxhmV+0W75ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACYmcDp_KAxcpXVEKQf5KhEs4r0MnqFQV6JaRKDxhmV+0W75ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1b.0.190715
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=shwethab@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0e0:1007::27]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d42be413-1ab4-415a-eb0c-08d71a03577d
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:CY4PR11MB0071;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY4PR11MB0071:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY4PR11MB0071F1043B0E4DDB353DB79FD6D50@CY4PR11MB0071.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0121F24F22
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(346002)(376002)(51914003)(199004)(189003)(71200400001)(71190400001)(486006)(66446008)(186003)(91956017)(76116006)(76176011)(53936002)(236005)(6506007)(53546011)(5660300002)(6916009)(6436002)(86362001)(6512007)(6306002)(54896002)(606006)(6486002)(14454004)(4326008)(8676002)(316002)(58126008)(81156014)(54906003)(81166006)(102836004)(33656002)(6246003)(66946007)(476003)(2616005)(446003)(11346002)(36756003)(256004)(966005)(68736007)(64756008)(66556008)(99286004)(478600001)(2906002)(25786009)(14444005)(66476007)(6116002)(7736002)(8936002)(46003)(229853002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY4PR11MB0071; H:CY4PR11MB0054.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: HtfUtjJkcYj8Zm7L48S15ACxG6iuDoYcGXaMAI2kBK3icKILtL3YO1PxII+x9EWtB17NqsAqyaXW3armWY+wDBGI+TrKgYb8Y/zppjaeO7eUDE8iP5d39/4VP36ZnAuTmxrfLeG+sdeIwx1e1jmFqWfGnLBNReAgfQbJoOjr+LWYv+pIaQq9hMwXEyGXrumIBEfuGNq1ZEGPbMKNDx240J5etcEITA5l9lHy6lD1FHz+YnfpZUgI+k8yZpzqxsP9vjdOqCE9QxVXzaxwL0/ewy2VDNs9r4sj6rKOdo2DBgjhyGX/rn8Lm60mTDxM76a8zYn3mrErYtTvo/8uyQsXUcgx1L1t1IW5h/ky/VOojSiCJdV5FHvwv5LYyMI+sLikwAiCcdSrZgNCoGRl+BOEoIIMQHjACbysV8eslNhp8H0=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76AEA799CE6F476E988ACB245CFBC19Aciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d42be413-1ab4-415a-eb0c-08d71a03577d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Aug 2019 00:16:34.9119 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: shwethab@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY4PR11MB0071
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.23, xch-aln-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/r68jlyUEbkCqs4Qbe6w91IPmkf8>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:16:42 -0000

I support adoption of this draft (as a co-author).

Shwetha


On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:07 AM Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch<mailto:ietf@trammell.ch>> wrote:
hi Greg,

Thanks for the feedback; absolutely, we can do this the normal way. Authors: let's do a normal two-week adoption call for this document before publishing the update.

This adoption call starts now.

IPPM, please respond to this message with an indication to the mailing list of your support for adopting draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags as a working group document, in partial fulfillment of our charter milestone "submit a Standards Track draft on inband OAM based measurement methodologies to the IESG" (obviously, depending on how many documents we end up sending to the IESG, we may have to change the plurality of this milestone). If you do not support this, please send a message to the list explaining why.

Thanks, cheers,

Brian (as IPPM co-chair)


> On 25 Jul 2019, at 13:15, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear Chairs, et al.,
> I appreciate that editors of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data followed on the decision of the WG reached at the meeting in Prague to extract material not directly related to the definition of iOAM data elements from the document. The new draft was presented earlier this week and generated many comments. I feel that it would be right to discuss the draft and its relevance to the charter of the IPPM WG before starting WG adoption poll.
>
> Regards,
> Greg

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm