IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG

guo.jun2@zte.com.cn Fri, 02 September 2022 10:40 UTC

Return-Path: <guo.jun2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5EAC14CE3F for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 03:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.893
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.893 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4bT001JHmSHT for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 03:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5A00C1522AB for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 03:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4MJvZ550RYz8R03x for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 18:40:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4MJvYV5S2Bz4xq1l; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 18:39:42 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp04.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.203]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 282AdXS3006480; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 18:39:33 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from guo.jun2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 18:39:33 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 18:39:33 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa6311dd65252f62f1
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202209021839330946723@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB4131BFFD304468FA4CCD0484E27B9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: AM0PR07MB4131BFFD304468FA4CCD0484E27B9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: guo.jun2@zte.com.cn
To: marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 282AdXS3006480
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.137.novalocal with ID 6311DD8D.000 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1662115213/4MJvZ550RYz8R03x/6311DD8D.000/192.168.251.13/[192.168.251.13]/mxct.zte.com.cn/<guo.jun2@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6311DD8D.000/4MJvZ550RYz8R03x
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/rO-OGEP6HeuK0RZqdgSuTGqgT5o>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 10:40:20 -0000

As a coauthor, I support the adoption of these two drafts. 


I think they are uesful for the network


























郭俊


软件平台南京开发三部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 





中兴通讯股份有限公司


南京市雨花台区紫荆花路68号南研一期2楼，210012


T: xxxxxxx     M: 18105183663


E: guo.jun2@zte.com.cn













Original



From: MarcusIhlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>;
Date: 2022年09月02日 00:44
Subject: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG


_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

 

Hello IPPM,


This email starts an adoption call in the IPPM working group for the draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag and draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag documents. These documents extend STAMP, OWAMP and TWAMP to support performance measurements on member links of a Link Aggregation Group.


 


The first draft specifies an extension to STAMP and can be found here:


https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/ 


https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/ 


 


The second draft specifies extensions to OWAMP and TWAMP and can be found here:


https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/


https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/


 


Please reply to this email by Thursday September 15, to indicate whether you support adoption of these documents.


 


BR


Marcus & Tommy

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email