Re: [ippm] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method

When -10 is done I'll send it back up.

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 1:47 PM MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com> wrote:

> Hi Tommy,
>
> Ruediger included many editorial comments in his reply to WGLC.
>
> I will resolve his comments tonight, or ASAP, and you will see version 10
> very soon.
>
> Al
>
>
>
> *From:* ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Tommy Pauly
> *Sent:* Monday, April 26, 2021 4:37 PM
> *To:* Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; Martin Duke <
> martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [ippm] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method
>
>
>
> Thanks for your input, all! We will be progressing this document back up
> to the IESG.
>
>
>
> @Martin, can you take the document from here for another round of
> evaluation?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Tommy
>
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2021, at 4:05 PM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello IPPM,
>
>
>
> This email starts a short re-working group last call for the revisions to
> draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method. During IESG review, there were
> several DISCUSS positions that led to refinements in the document.
>
>
>
> The current version, -09, can be found here:
>
>
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09__;!!BhdT!w3S8ST0i-xIpu9EHfa9bRFjG9SmAnUXZgZz4KaP3YMYo-lDu7Fy6Dybyk9cH$>
>
>
>
> You can find a diff between -06 and -09 here:
>
>
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-06&url2=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-06&url2=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09__;!!BhdT!w3S8ST0i-xIpu9EHfa9bRFjG9SmAnUXZgZz4KaP3YMYo-lDu7Fy6D6fbWxSI$>
>
>
>
> I’d suggest focusing your reviews on these changes.
>
>
>
> Please provide feedback on whether or not you believe these changes are
> ready for re-publication to the IESG by *Monday, April 26*.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Tommy
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm__;!!BhdT!w3S8ST0i-xIpu9EHfa9bRFjG9SmAnUXZgZz4KaP3YMYo-lDu7Fy6Dw79LqMo$>
>
>
>