Re: [ippm] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Mon, 26 April 2021 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C253A2F2E for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vwwr5c4c4Y4N for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x132.google.com (mail-il1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 618163A2F30 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x132.google.com with SMTP id v13so7976993ilj.8 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UU+hXrDCMgCy5RbuIImXI1TMJ8FSbCxrgByq4o2PPKA=; b=shKH4slBQ15csZsyWAtba7AulUhxsOSBukMmcAQhkxlC//oWTJpPELAxJler3Sc+nB 1m97ghhSY7g2bvLCCHGLRTYU0ZfBGRiXjRYK0yEryDHBEUn7ILrKGjaC5nkJnlVx7X9O pT8DIkOBgo0IfUcHkKPzP04+h33xS3wjsqx2o9+3oImZEK2WQOJ8FT0JuDc4ccsm4YbQ MYUOv35NGXKWHBWPdS4+REKIzxaKSndljZa4luYSPtu2Dfo7L8pvfK3rKkodwfU7tCx7 qNs7dIUMVgm+oD9jYiBrDJjBBT18Xqy+h0Be4RY7HfIq9C9PkmbcmqFXevW6Ud8T9Kiu 0+TQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UU+hXrDCMgCy5RbuIImXI1TMJ8FSbCxrgByq4o2PPKA=; b=me5UHAQYnoFsqSAC8w6Sqw/CT0h6gh9iPEvPhpgDSpdmaJqggVZ+WsDoEz/Kfdavky gjjJYb5QLqA38khXHVWApzxu3TXGnyIbD9ZEyNyqvP+sliiywKNuSbuX58l9RePiqxJu MC9/i6N7Ga/WDhTfWTba/tx0qvb/umg5xaJ5rN/NLXKOSJY2rwcFJiBG4WTcRM+AFJ/i NhYHRLXr77qGdGf4scmhgRRdl6atsPMaKMsU0c1Ol8z3keChsUeFJOEVfmv6C7S+iz4M 9knU4GX5bmgC9mFOfq+J4hb8mQmF+XoL7PkS2lRssqJWWwS0j/Wf6Bmcb9h9ZLshV6/V z3lg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Z/AQZ+BCNtf8NyStkeJRV+H5GJBS9E7K9IZCBIcNBO+//oP0w K0Im4+nMJJ2O9pV0MMgydAO/hCtBsWfcyNnGYmg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8yIp5N/0rwP/paS1A4wx32w5Oxhyo1vKqsr4mISED6jLMmYJZJ9/C4QOF2obLyHdXBbQIOKrsWBr+q6KP5pU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:4c4:: with SMTP id f4mr15622124ils.272.1619470089468; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0B497121-1EA9-4963-8F0C-7F55502447FE@apple.com> <7BC0ADB5-3928-46B6-8715-618D3F589241@apple.com> <e8112773fbe6493eb00b20922f5884ae@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <e8112773fbe6493eb00b20922f5884ae@att.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:47:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxS3+NG2Jsxh_wgkdZJPs5QSM9XiU=RW8SSA6ysM8VjX7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "MORTON JR., AL" <acmorton@att.com>
Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000683f7205c0e64315"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/rkxV5JgWDkPA-yASuGY-_4slcE8>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:48:17 -0000

When -10 is done I'll send it back up.

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 1:47 PM MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com> wrote:

> Hi Tommy,
>
> Ruediger included many editorial comments in his reply to WGLC.
>
> I will resolve his comments tonight, or ASAP, and you will see version 10
> very soon.
>
> Al
>
>
>
> *From:* ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Tommy Pauly
> *Sent:* Monday, April 26, 2021 4:37 PM
> *To:* Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>rg>; Martin Duke <
> martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [ippm] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method
>
>
>
> Thanks for your input, all! We will be progressing this document back up
> to the IESG.
>
>
>
> @Martin, can you take the document from here for another round of
> evaluation?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Tommy
>
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2021, at 4:05 PM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello IPPM,
>
>
>
> This email starts a short re-working group last call for the revisions to
> draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method. During IESG review, there were
> several DISCUSS positions that led to refinements in the document.
>
>
>
> The current version, -09, can be found here:
>
>
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09__;!!BhdT!w3S8ST0i-xIpu9EHfa9bRFjG9SmAnUXZgZz4KaP3YMYo-lDu7Fy6Dybyk9cH$>
>
>
>
> You can find a diff between -06 and -09 here:
>
>
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-06&url2=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-06&url2=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09__;!!BhdT!w3S8ST0i-xIpu9EHfa9bRFjG9SmAnUXZgZz4KaP3YMYo-lDu7Fy6D6fbWxSI$>
>
>
>
> I’d suggest focusing your reviews on these changes.
>
>
>
> Please provide feedback on whether or not you believe these changes are
> ready for re-publication to the IESG by *Monday, April 26*.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Tommy
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm__;!!BhdT!w3S8ST0i-xIpu9EHfa9bRFjG9SmAnUXZgZz4KaP3YMYo-lDu7Fy6Dw79LqMo$>
>
>
>