[ippm] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-07.txt
Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Mon, 09 March 2020 16:41 UTC
Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2793A1422; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kd3GqgJNL7MY; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07A333A1419; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 14C17D183D92A0B2C1DA; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:41:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:41:44 +0000
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:41:44 +0100
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:41:44 +0100
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
To: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
CC: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, Steve Hanna <steve@hannas.com>, "draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-07.txt
Thread-Index: AQHV9jDCcaV4g0oYgUCVA3vWjh3oJKhAdaEA
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:41:44 +0000
Message-ID: <345babf6550a4c4ab0a183085a8f893d@huawei.com>
References: <158377169717.5554.9946434031277419427@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158377169717.5554.9946434031277419427@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.9.136]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/sWpjeN-lWqHQZpzjd_fiLZDfgXs>
Subject: [ippm] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-07.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:41:56 -0000
Dear Mirja, All, I have just uploaded the new revision that addresses the comments received from Genart last call review. Regards, Giuseppe -----Original Message----- From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 5:35 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: ippm@ietf.org Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-07.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Measurement WG of the IETF. Title : Multipoint Alternate Marking method for passive and hybrid performance monitoring Authors : Giuseppe Fioccola Mauro Cociglio Amedeo Sapio Riccardo Sisto Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-07.txt Pages : 23 Date : 2020-03-09 Abstract: The Alternate Marking method, as presented in RFC 8321, can be applied only to point-to-point flows because it assumes that all the packets of the flow measured on one node are measured again by a single second node. This document aims to generalize and expand this methodology to measure any kind of unicast flows, whose packets can follow several different paths in the network, in wider terms a multipoint-to-multipoint network. For this reason the technique here described is called Multipoint Alternate Marking. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-07 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-07 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-07 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list ippm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
- [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt… internet-drafts
- [ippm] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint… Giuseppe Fioccola