Re: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06

"Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <fbrockne@cisco.com> Tue, 13 August 2019 07:07 UTC

Return-Path: <fbrockne@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E015120090; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=P8vyTETH; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=vdsF8EWS
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U2YYrpdhNiBx; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B47F0120077; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=866; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1565680077; x=1566889677; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=0VVucNuLeVnnzv4f0WmTFLi3QcuGOJCgnzTr+B6Lq1A=; b=P8vyTETHvEHX87C4sPYAALC+tbu/T9/9l1dW2KIB85oNliBtJW4Qv9xc RMRJH6wUdV9V9aFHf+US6klGmHPp3XGDFc7OeIpWIb/lRVK6Q4sO7amDU TAQqVmNWDq1ImFw3P8by/by4JNTWj0ZS08MI3IeGw0IfxEwKcwsrDknS4 s=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AoLYWPR8XG6nZ4/9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ65?= =?us-ascii?q?0hzqhDabmn44+8ZR7E/fs4iljPUM2b8P9Ch+fM+4HYEW0bqdfk0jgZdYBUER?= =?us-ascii?q?oMiMEYhQslVcCPE0rwL/jnRyc7B89FElRi+iLzPA=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AIAADDYFJd/5RdJa1mGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUwQBAQEBAQsBgURQA4FCIAQLKgqHWwOEUoY9TIIPl2K?= =?us-ascii?q?BLhSBEANUCQEBAQwBAS0CAQGEPwKCciM0CQ4BBAEBBAEBBAEKbYUnDIVKAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQMSKAYBATgLBAIBCBEEAQEfEDIdCAEBBAESCBqEawMdAQKhMQKBOIhggiW?= =?us-ascii?q?CegEBBYUBGIIUCYE0AYtjF4FAP4ERRoJMPoQMOoM7giarTgkCgh2LX4humD2?= =?us-ascii?q?NVZgDAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFQOIFYcBWDJ4JCg3KGeYNacoEpjH0BgSABAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,380,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="613671615"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 Aug 2019 07:07:56 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7D77u95013784 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:07:56 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 02:07:55 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 03:07:55 -0400
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 02:07:55 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=H2vxZ+LHN/0GJ7IPO1NTnZJSK46iCTj1gSn4sZiTfeD9fyqM/Y+862UUYAmRfPlwnsx9CG7V10WjezMjX4BjTBQlMT7zUsIBpz2WbRaF/t7j6ksVQJgYiG1CF5IVRonxVYhdCBimSzzyqgap5Z9KN1tpavgARnN+nQUWE6wD7YNsxF4XsyZgLcSJbLgMDQV0UOQxLQJtPgMFph4GUo0FWlMnXlfe80jZLqeAcOYk7eB1WsoLyQikKYaY04jyZMp0fS164EpKpOH2xiHSiCmenFdeB3z42FGny4VtlCZqUZXmwMb3mIlYUiaGW7nWHjtzKVk0YBey2eM8URPCcTtvnA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=0VVucNuLeVnnzv4f0WmTFLi3QcuGOJCgnzTr+B6Lq1A=; b=D+t2mfkFTIrdM1XP4KdvbkfnN476yEtWvzsYgAVQDUd3ZlyuJUD3ssbUV0X/CeAqTeiZmpWDoq6i5OiayxxT1hln5FsWxt43gajZ7qUut+mb36+ds2nmxmxGnZfkM6GErQhimezSaIbR9xxc/4dOm9EoQMxkrUtcg0hMdn9l3RDHdHLHiojNgCJH2vsqA0AWel6QiJllyVz74ycRm+Vtjlq1aZviDIJVWiVmcKklyXgsM8e9uK17if/RNro3IFZhAf/Q2nw1FqsgnIaiE7s8RJsY53LujmZXWvlaWfdFdM5wQ4t7pBU/3+xB3V6L4TkmIBuBlfsSQ8n/RW2wnv9LkA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=0VVucNuLeVnnzv4f0WmTFLi3QcuGOJCgnzTr+B6Lq1A=; b=vdsF8EWSeCaacCKXYlvTBffteKXN4mRNao+pL0csnNbXecK9/ICOKjVI5OROq19kkQpRY8Hh9nsnPqlcMMaaeZNX0QovKgm+cbgT35gzXSLdADqN8sTklaPG8v3bjN/5p3V0CuipoFx4f/VdmK5C86WbxWClg72mp7+BU8nsYTA=
Received: from SN6PR11MB2589.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.91.22) by SN6PR11MB3247.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.112.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2157.18; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:07:54 +0000
Received: from SN6PR11MB2589.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6b:67b2:748:a82a]) by SN6PR11MB2589.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6b:67b2:748:a82a%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2157.022; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:07:54 +0000
From: "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <fbrockne@cisco.com>
To: Haoyu Song <haoyu.song@futurewei.com>, "draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06
Thread-Index: AdVRaVuwRvhTeI2VTDyRJBkRgBuuOwAPCiFA
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:07:53 +0000
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB25894B96CD73BB957EB57E33DAD20@SN6PR11MB2589.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR13MB3582D134144C09AEB4A2AFBF9AD30@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR13MB3582D134144C09AEB4A2AFBF9AD30@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=fbrockne@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.45]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7ac1f865-5ef1-42c2-7580-08d71fbcf63e
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:SN6PR11MB3247;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR11MB3247:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR11MB32471EAEB416A75A5E6C5841DAD20@SN6PR11MB3247.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 01283822F8
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(346002)(376002)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(71190400001)(71200400001)(74316002)(53936002)(7696005)(186003)(256004)(110136005)(99286004)(66446008)(11346002)(2906002)(66946007)(86362001)(14454004)(52536014)(316002)(6246003)(76116006)(66476007)(14444005)(66556008)(64756008)(478600001)(229853002)(3846002)(81156014)(476003)(102836004)(33656002)(6506007)(486006)(5660300002)(2501003)(8676002)(4744005)(8936002)(81166006)(53546011)(76176011)(25786009)(6116002)(9686003)(66066001)(55016002)(26005)(6436002)(7736002)(446003)(305945005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR11MB3247; H:SN6PR11MB2589.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 6q+Pw1JUJPba+bKNnnj1v9m1upLBp4mCNQKkLvlzDH6zyHGK7gR24RPZdcmTE04uuNRAcNtiw23AaXFNz++cIXjJJtfuIvq14yPaTv1Ayf57aH7RaLWC/hfFQl13tFjl4dUE9Gh1jiIL91CwC4ZvVGm9JlbRpXfVUzqUDzAokozg0eWw4FOqG49qD9PYYbBGW2sASJkadmmrdJFRaQRNYLsKToMnTE8kARgOYQ+cNptMywB3hY1FxuWW6oI7MpU+E0YBniIUFLCo6W7C9dIZTvsDDfGAuAEuxaJzn1T9uBmNp02id6S53gLjxJrntjwQa3TICouDwaEBeklAuEk7UL15rYXmpjYuYjf3/Qzba5iDUKxOB5cwuURxXCw1IGFYMgiZQSJJvx0WNkt+VAyk7BI8oOoaAN7EK7o3gaBF2yk=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7ac1f865-5ef1-42c2-7580-08d71fbcf63e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Aug 2019 07:07:53.8237 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: w8MPsT2S541Fx9xZPcX0hNJRWjptH7PPy5BIAwPCfeTcbs/oBR9cXJBitSKOM+jQWCd2Zakh2i8uwQOXHVyQqw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR11MB3247
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.23, xch-aln-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/sdqQfAo9lOlydLV6dro1eJ3B9M0>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:08:00 -0000

Hi Haoyu,

Thanks for your comments. They key point you raise is consistent nomenclature - which we definitively need to address in the next revision. Not uncommon for a document with many different authors - but now is indeed the time to tidy things up and get the house in order.

Thanks again, Frank

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haoyu Song <haoyu.song@futurewei.com>
> Sent: Dienstag, 13. August 2019 02:00
> To: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data@ietf.org; IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
> Subject: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06
> 
> Dear IOAM data authors and IPPM WG,
> 
> To sync up with the latest, I reread the draft and gave it a full review.
> Some questions, comments, and suggestions are marked in the document.
> Hopefully this can help to tighten the draft.
> Thanks!
> 
> Best regards,
> Haoyu
>