[ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7679 (6831)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 03 February 2022 07:54 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8393A2195 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 23:54:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ECfSed_vCT0W for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 23:54:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D0A33A2190 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 23:54:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 8DE7EEB6C8; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 23:53:59 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: nmalykh@ieee.org, almes@acm.org, skalidindi@ixiacom.com, matt@internet2.edu, acmorton@att.com, ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220203075359.8DE7EEB6C8@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 23:53:59 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/uCc5GGkNmepHof5FR0Wb-Tkk56o>
Subject: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7679 (6831)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 07:54:07 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7679, "A One-Way Delay Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6831 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@ieee.org> Section: 7 Original Text ------------- The text above constitutes a revision to RFC 2769, which is now an Internet Standard. This section tracks the changes from [RFC2679]. Corrected Text -------------- The text above constitutes a revision to RFC 2679, which is now an Internet Standard. This section tracks the changes from [RFC2679]. Notes ----- Typo in RFC number (2769 instead 2679). Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7679 (draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis-05) -------------------------------------- Title : A One-Way Delay Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Publication Date : January 2016 Author(s) : G. Almes, S. Kalidindi, M. Zekauskas, A. Morton, Ed. Category : INTERNET STANDARD Source : IP Performance Measurement Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7679 (6831) RFC Errata System
- Re: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7679 (6… Guy Almes
- Re: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7679 (6… MORTON JR., AL
- Re: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7679 (6… Guy Almes
- Re: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7679 (6… MORTON JR., AL