[ippm] R: IPPM WG Status and Agenda for IETF 95 Buenos Aires

Fioccola Giuseppe <giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it> Mon, 14 March 2016 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1661712DC0C; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.222
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yo9cv0Im1tc8; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from teledg002ba020.telecomitalia.it (teledg002ba020.telecomitalia.it [156.54.233.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A04D12DC1F; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TELCAH006BA020.telecomitalia.local (10.188.101.224) by teledg002ba020.telecomitalia.it (10.188.101.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.266.1; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:41:42 +0100
Received: from TELMBB001BA020.telecomitalia.local ([169.254.2.43]) by telcah006ba020.telecomitalia.local ([10.188.101.224]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:41:41 +0100
From: Fioccola Giuseppe <giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it>
To: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, "ippm-chairs@ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] IPPM WG Status and Agenda for IETF 95 Buenos Aires
Thread-Index: AQHRe5Yb2eBUaP6Tt0SZCsAuuJgSFp9YtIvg
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:41:41 +0000
Message-ID: <23126F6FC5CA3E44916CF99D4E0B878B44F9962A@TELMBB001BA020.telecomitalia.local>
References: <5E975C36-26D3-422B-A511-A2CE410A8606@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <5E975C36-26D3-422B-A511-A2CE410A8606@trammell.ch>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: it-IT
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.188.101.195]
x-ti-disclaimer: Disclaimer1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/uZp2HokQea_B2ocoydGsoIoGHag>
Cc: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] R: IPPM WG Status and Agenda for IETF 95 Buenos Aires
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:42:04 -0000

Brian and Bill,
Many thanks for the opportunity.
A discussion on next steps for the three "coloring" drafts is a good point.
We are updating the drafts after comments received from mailing list and we will send the presentation soon.

Regards,

Giuseppe

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] Per conto di Brian Trammell
Inviato: venerdì 11 marzo 2016 14:01
A: ippm@ietf.org
Oggetto: [ippm] IPPM WG Status and Agenda for IETF 95 Buenos Aires

Greetings, all,

First, let us congratulate the IPPM working group on its excellent productivity in finally-published-RFC terms: we've seen five(!) documents published since Yokohama:

- RFC 7679 (was draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis)  A One-Way Delay Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)
- RFC 7680 (was draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis)  A One-Way Loss Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)
- RFC 7717 (was draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec)
 IKEv2-Derived Shared Secret Key for the One-Way Active Measurement  Protocol (OWAMP) and Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)
- RFC 7718 (was draft-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry)  Registries for the One-Way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP)
- RFC 7750 (was draft-ietf-ippm-type-p-monitor)  Differentiated Service Code Point and Explicit Congestion  Notification Monitoring in the Two-Way Active Measurement  Protocol (TWAMP)

In addition:

- RFC-to-be 7799 (draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-06) just entered AUTH48
- draft-ietf-ippm-checksum-trailer-06 has been approved and is in queue

Well done, IPPM!


With that, it's time to consider what to work on next, in order to plan our agenda for the meeting in Buenos Aires. We have a couple of active Working Group drafts:

- draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option, in WGLC until next Friday.
- draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry, to be revised on WGLC comments.
- draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics, which needs work before a second WGLC.

We'll want time on the agenda for all three of these.

We've also adopted two new WG documents, for which we expect to see dratf-ietf-ippm- revisions before Monday 21 March:

- draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang
- draft-morton-ippm-initial-registry

We'll want time on the agenda for these, too.

Beyond that, we've reviewed discussion on the mailing list to see where the working group's energy seems to be for additional documents. First, we have seen a lot of discussion on what we call the "hybrid/coloring cluster", so I think we should have a discussion about approaches here, how they fit together, and what if anything we should consider adopting in this space:

- draft-tempia-ippm-p3m
- draft-chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework
- draft-fioccola-ippm-rfc6812-alt-mark-ext

We've already talked to Giuseppe Fioccola about these, and would like to propose a single presentation about all three followed by a long discussion slot.

There's also been some discussion on draft-mirsky-ippm-time-format, and it seems like this one might be close enough to make an adoption call for too.

All other drafts: As discussed in Yokohama, we'd like to reserve time for work that's actually already being discussed on the list, so at the end of the agenda we'll have time for discussion of new work without any substantial discussion so far. These will be organized as 5 minute lightning talks, and allocated FCFS in two queues, with completely new drafts having priority over ones that have already been presented.

We're tentatively scheduled for a 2.5 hour slot on Monday morning, but there is discussion about moving us back to a 2 hour slot on Friday, so we'd propose the following agenda, with the last slot being either 15 or 45 minutes long:

10:00: Note well, intro, status, agenda bash (chairs, 10m)
10:10: draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry
      WGLC discussion completion, as req'd (10m)
10:20: draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option
      WGLC discussion completion (N. Elkins, 15m)
10:35: draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics
      new revision / second WGLC kickoff (M. Mathis, 10m)
10:45: Coloring/Hybrid Approach Presentation and Discussion (TBD, 45m)
      draft-tempia-ippm-p3m
      draft-chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework
      draft-fioccola-ippm-rfc6812-alt-mark-ext
      Discussion; decision on call to adopt?
11:30: draft-mirsky-ippm-time-format (G. Mirsky, 15m)
      Discussion: decision on call to adopt?
11:45: Lightning talks for new work: two requests received so far:
      draft-bailmir-ippm-twamp-dscp-ctrl-mon-00 (G. Mirsky)
      draft-mirsky-ippm-twamp-light-yang-02 (G. Mirsky)

Authors: please let us know if you have any corrections here. Those with new work to present: please let us know if you'd like a lightning talk slot.

Cheers,

Brian and Bill (chair hats)

Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.