IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang

Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> Wed, 24 February 2016 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DC11B3AAF for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:26:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qNN3GVT6MxLi for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:25:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usplmg20.ericsson.net (usplmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B7191B3B62 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:25:59 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c618062d-f79dd6d000003091-6b-56cdf188c93b
Received: from EUSAAHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.87]) by usplmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 4C.C8.12433.881FDC65; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:08:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC005.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:25:56 -0500
From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>, "draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org" <draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang
Thread-Index: AdFqbLsNtCaeQhkcSNaNNzLViFP6yQDKKviwAGSdoAAAAgQ5sA==
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:25:54 +0000
Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF112219E1CC6@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF112219DD0CE@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <D2F278FD.128927%rrahman@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2F278FD.128927%rrahman@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.9]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF112219E1CC6eusaamb103erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprPIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPuG7Hx7NhBicna1jsX3iVxaLnwTtm i2srWtkdmD2m/N7I6rFkyU8mjy+XP7MFMEdx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZcyeuJm54F9ixa6Lm5ka GP+EdTFyckgImEi8W32WCcIWk7hwbz1bFyMXh5DAEUaJe8v/MEM4yxklevrmsYJUsQkYSbzY 2MMOkhARmMQo8eLmVxaQBLOAssTeV/MZQWxhAS2JS1M+gtkiAtoSh1eeYIawnSRuTN3EBmKz CKhKTHkzB2wor4CvxP3Dh9hBbCGBYolFnW/AbE4BA4l1J2+A9TICnff91BomiF3iEreezIc6 W0BiyZ7zzBC2qMTLx/9YIWxFiX3909kh6vMlrjd8ZYfYJShxcuYTlgmMorOQjJqFpGwWkjKI uI7Egt2f2CBsbYllC18zw9hnDjxmQhZfwMi+ipGjtLggJzfdyGATIzDajkmw6e5gvD/d8xCj AAejEg+vwZozYUKsiWXFlbmHGCU4mJVEeOWeng0T4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xCjNwaIkzrvU YX2YkEB6YklqdmpqQWoRTJaJg1OqgdFH8enEA/E69sUlJzXCzDha4zpPt6ywkA1X05VRnvKI y3xa4VqFrHtPFLZvkv4qIhd4oaI86K75gj013Jv8X0+fd/IPN8/ix/rTPCbq6P1aufXdhwU7 l/3+N6fKkOOFtMq5PGvnFW2v33+KvNlgfLZjmfgBN8tH21a+XtSYKtz++LTvW0d1wxNKLMUZ iYZazEXFiQCQ+4qFsgIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/u__4TOTBGksnS5UBllMeZQDG8sw>
Cc: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:26:09 -0000

Hi Reshad,
thank you for your consideration. If we agree that port numbers for a test session must be only from the dynamic range, then this range should be imposed in the data model on sender-udp-port and reflector-udp-port. At this time both are inet:port-number.

                Regards,
                                Greg

From: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) [mailto:rrahman@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:22 AM
To: Gregory Mirsky; draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang

Hi Greg,

Apologies for the delayed response. I agree with your comment.

Regards,
Reshad.

From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com<mailto:gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>>
Date: Monday, February 22, 2016 at 12:21 PM
To: "draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org>>
Cc: "ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>" <ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang
Resent-From: <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com<mailto:gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>>
Resent-To: <draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@ietf.org<mailto:draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@ietf.org>>
Resent-Date: Monday, February 22, 2016 at 12:21 PM

Dear Authors, et. al,
please consider this comment as part of WG adoption call discussion.

                Regards,
                                Greg

From: Gregory Mirsky
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 8:59 AM
To: 'draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org<mailto:'draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang@tools.ietf.org>'
Cc: ippm@ietf.org<mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: draft-cmzrjp-ippm-twamp-yang

Dear Authors,
I've noticed that detailed data model examples in Appendix A use UDP port numbers from the registered range of UDP port numbers. The registered range is administered by IANA and port numbers should not be used for applications other than it was registered to. I believe that UDP port numbers for TWAMP test must be used from dynamic, private range of port numbers 49152-65535. Use of port numbers described in RFC 6335 in details.

What do you think?

                Regards,
                                Greg

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status