Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv
<xiao.min2@zte.com.cn> Tue, 09 July 2019 09:11 UTC
Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7358E1203D1; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 02:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3dzziLq4QBnV; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 02:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EA071203C8; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 02:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id AE29F991D5123DE0424B; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 17:11:48 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp05.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.204]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id x6991UNv040119; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 17:01:30 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 17:01:30 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:01:30 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af95d2457ea93f8cd54
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <201907091701303656211@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <C3852A60-4580-47E9-A998-C0026D36523B@apple.com>
References: C3852A60-4580-47E9-A998-C0026D36523B@apple.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: ippm@ietf.org, draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn x6991UNv040119
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/uy2-Z-JrO_jKesu__6TpuYxYX4U>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:11:53 -0000
Hi all, I support WG adoption of this draft as co-author. Cheers, Xiao Min 原始邮件 发件人:TommyPauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> 收件人:IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>; 抄送人:draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv@ietf.org <draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv@ietf.org>; 日 期 :2019年07月09日 06:48 主 题 :[ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list ippm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm Hello IPPM, This message begins an adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv, "Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol Optional Extensions”. The document has been discussed on the list recently, with good input and reviews from the group. We’d like to get the working group’s input on if this document should be adopted and worked on by the group. The current status and text of the document can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv/ https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-05 Please respond to this email by Tuesday, July 23 to indicate whether or not you think IPPM should adopt and work on the extensions and extension mechanism described in this draft. Best,Tommy (as IPPM co-chair)
- [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-… Tommy Pauly
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… xiao.min2
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… guo.jun2
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Henrik Nydell
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Jai Kumar
- [ippm] R: [EXT] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ip… Cociglio Mauro
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… David Sinicrope
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… David Sinicrope
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Foote, Footer (Nokia - CA)
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… Tommy Pauly
- Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-st… J Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin