[ippm] Alvaro Retana's Yes on charter-ietf-ippm-05-00: (with COMMENT)

[Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>]

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-ippm-05-00: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-ippm/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I fully support this update.

However, is the intent to change the name of the WG at the same time?   The
Internal Review announcement, as well as the write-ups talk about "IP
Performance Metrics", but the first line of the charter says "IP Performance
Measurement" instead.  I don't object to the name change, it may in fact be a
better reflection of the work, but I think it is a process issue (if the name
is to be changed) that should be addressed before approval.