[ippm] [IANA #1232404] [Errata Verified] RFC9197 (6992)

Amanda Baber via RT <iana-matrix@iana.org> Fri, 17 June 2022 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED5AC15D898; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.656
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.656 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qMwlsGKlGubi; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C825C13C2C9; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B94E5DA1; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:42:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4539520454; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:42:38 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-matrix@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-matrix@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <20220615213853.D9D7722AA3F@rfcpa.amsl.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1232404@icann.org> <20220615213853.D9D7722AA3F@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-19198-1655494958-457.1232404-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1232404
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
CC: tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com, shwetha.bhandari@thoughtspot.com, rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org, nmalykh@ieee.org, ippm@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, fbrockne@cisco.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:42:38 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/vrodouLxjPuxv2xCPMRMpnBxutk>
Subject: [ippm] [IANA #1232404] [Errata Verified] RFC9197 (6992)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:42:43 -0000

Hi,

Because the registration template is affected, we've listed this errata as an additional reference for the IOAM Trace-Flags registry:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/ioam

Best regards,

Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager

On Wed Jun 15 21:39:17 2022, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> The following errata report has been verified for RFC9197,
>  "Data Fields for In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance
> (IOAM)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6992
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Status: Verified
> Type: Editorial
> 
> Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@ieee.org>
> Date Reported: 2022-06-15
>   Verified by: RFC Editor
> 
> Section: 7.3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Bit:  desired bit to be allocated in the 8-bit flags field of the
>    Pre-allocated Trace Option-Type and Incremental Trace Option-Type
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Bit:  desired bit to be allocated in the 4-bit flags field of the
>    Pre-allocated Trace Option-Type and Incremental Trace Option-Type
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The size of the Flags field is 4 bits, not 8.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9197 (draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-17)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Data Fields for In Situ Operations,
> Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM)
> Publication Date    : May 2022
> Author(s)           : F. Brockners, Ed., S. Bhandari, Ed., T. Mizrahi,
> Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : IP Performance Measurement
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF