Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-02.txt

IPPM,

The revisions to the WG memo below are the result of
preparing the first draft RFC 2680 bis, which can be found at
the URLs below:

Filename:	 draft-morton-ippm-2680-bis
Revision:	 00
Title:		 A One-Way Loss Metric for IPPM
Creation date:	 2013-02-17
Group:		 Individual Submission
Number of pages: 20
URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-morton-ippm-2680-bis-00.txt
Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morton-ippm-2680-bis
Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morton-ippm-2680-bis-00

Abstract:
   This memo (RFC 2680 bis) defines a metric for one-way loss of packets
   across Internet paths.  It builds on notions introduced and discussed
   in the IPPM Framework document, RFC 2330; the reader is assumed to be
   familiar with that document.

regards,
Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org]
> On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 4:16 PM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: ippm@ietf.org
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-02.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Metrics Working Group of
> the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on
> the Standards Track
> 	Author(s)       : Len Ciavattone
>                           Ruediger Geib
>                           Al Morton
>                           Matthias Wieser
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-02.txt
> 	Pages           : 27
> 	Date            : 2013-02-17
> 
> Abstract:
>    This memo proposes to advance a performance metric RFC along the
>    standards track, specifically RFC 2680 on One-way Loss Metrics.
>    Observing that the metric definitions themselves should be the
>    primary focus rather than the implementations of metrics, this memo
>    describes the test procedures to evaluate specific metric requirement
>    clauses to determine if the requirement has been interpreted and
>    implemented as intended.  Two completely independent implementations
>    have been tested against the key specifications of RFC 2680.
> 
>    In this version, the results are presented in the R-tool output form.
>    Beautification is future work.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-02
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-02
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt