IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Fri, 02 September 2022 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CDCC14CF1C for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 06:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zwulz3Afk6sw for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 06:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7523DC14CF16 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 06:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id p16so3396139lfd.6 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 06:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=qwO5BdNYQlSMbELk2tW2Zsov0wWOJRbo35rgf77X7p4=; b=ex1F0pkkaHwnbRDiqvI7U3AUpUg9zLW6k6nnuQ9Q9X423/NkbxwCf2qx99R/e24j+q muHAroMvwrEDnG18IvreFCUZdoCxT010fd7vJnJ5yKowuGv2Z621GnhP1jUrUDLh6cts KlrnGe6IaS0k3YNeMdrYhRtSxPBTTy5UUnFsKug1IGi7z2Z1O56pcDHsfDsHsdiS3mw0 7b8VA1YJyTe6cy/AGd1Apn0bGqOfQdfXZlw0++crVlWmySgIdDTdgxhh3E3MEBm3UftF dorPwFNiiFLZ8As6Dz4fmH/6mYJVvIQiudLUIyoKrCiCdvzy74wOOTAgQCCBmmy1LlsS 9j3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=qwO5BdNYQlSMbELk2tW2Zsov0wWOJRbo35rgf77X7p4=; b=0R4oYZ227Q2XiwNGzHMLwX5wyPISjtpTYIlRaqfyR43Wi5/Zk1koNQ7PI03465sZD3 1ni+9Q3uMhcTcHJ8RNnk8BcZyQY+i0IhDFxqKfM8Ve+4uJKnBW7rU/uIvGYg7mRh56sb pZ9ZIBOPgUSxA6OAOpv2uyzzif3y9qVK/MYVr2rL4mJePnyAcRtQcH+mp7LTYJwxskrb cZTPmCmM1MfXb2+O+ywcE/thx28BMqnP2cZfxozHKyu7aA1bruttgn0SsPEdo7Ix3PW7 4Nf+6cN363fKvqePtsISUBet14ahMnONtPOnHS5n0+o0v2ggggNOYG1q/xg5ynMsYr8E o4Kg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2/EOZfx8XdQBU7y0iHpIRhc1PxQdj09pYpWpRDbecsdkICgbjH dhATWfq+73rxI7rtff+BIOXyVsXUXRLCKvf2WYiz2r6B
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6xKSgGcOVyAHnOJdtjoR7gtxe+HuDAj0yFcrlBiFImce2vKonnc5EXUDQOah6jZoJUjly/3WlNkSt6Cs8E8jc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:31c6:b0:48b:2771:d0d2 with SMTP id j6-20020a05651231c600b0048b2771d0d2mr11617828lfe.382.1662126624249; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 06:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AM0PR07MB4131BFFD304468FA4CCD0484E27B9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB4131BFFD304468FA4CCD0484E27B9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 06:50:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVc024nAC7BqrZ2TiHv7Py1yk1DjYZKX+DThhym_yM6ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000029ab805e7b203b0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/wg34RaKyJXsMEb221oUTUlrLpfQ>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 13:50:30 -0000

Dear Marcus, Tommy et al.,
as the co-authors, I support IPPM WG adoption of both drafts. I believe
that the use case that is the core of these drafts is real and the proposed
solutions are practical. Both drafts went through a number of revisions
that improved their readability.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 9:44 AM Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=
40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello IPPM,
>
> This email starts an adoption call in the IPPM working group for the
>  draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag and draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag documents.
> These documents extend STAMP, OWAMP and TWAMP to support performance
> measurements on member links of a Link Aggregation Group.
>
>
>
> The first draft specifies an extension to STAMP and can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/
>
>
>
> The second draft specifies extensions to OWAMP and TWAMP and can be found
> here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
>
>
>
> Please reply to this email by *Thursday September 15*, to indicate
> whether you support adoption of these documents.
>
>
>
> BR
>
> Marcus & Tommy
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email