[ippm] AD review for draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss-02

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Mon, 27 February 2012 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214CC21F87A9 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:15:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R8LJIFhZiJv0 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:15:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omr3.networksolutionsemail.com (omr3.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C4721F87A7 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:15:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cm-omr2 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr3.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q1RIFRbh000613 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:15:27 -0500
Authentication-Results: cm-omr2 smtp.user=wes@mti-systems.com; auth=pass (PLAIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from [107.47.230.34] ([107.47.230.34:7710] helo=[68.245.171.115]) by cm-omr2 (envelope-from <wes@mti-systems.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 98/83-23169-E38CB4F4; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:15:27 -0500
Message-ID: <4F4BC840.4060003@mti-systems.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:15:28 -0500
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>, "ippm-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [ippm] AD review for draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss-02
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:15:31 -0000

Hi, I've done an AD review of the rt-loss document and think
it's ready to go to IETF LC and IESG Review, except for one
question that I have on what may be simply a typo:

In Section 5, the last paragraph prior to 5.1 says:

   In the metric name, the variable <Stream> SHALL be replaced with the
   process used to define the sample, using one of the above processes
   (or other process, the details of which MUST be specified if used).

I believe, "<Stream>" should be "<Sample>"?  For instance,
section 5.1 is Name: Type-P-Round-trip-Loss-<Sample>-Stream and
section 6.1 is Type-P-Round-trip-Loss-<Sample>-Ratio.

-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems