IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] IETF 110 Draft Agenda Posted

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Fri, 26 February 2021 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA063A0D52 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:11:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j8EFt9QOExV9 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:11:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA4CD3A0D4E for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:11:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id p21so16028071lfu.11 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:11:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dSHP4VBqMNc7QAgjKaofnuJCXqVz2GvTTF9mTU1+ipI=; b=vQU+1kcIOflhXrpJo2Iem+b12J3NfrcVsCCUMvKaVqSkczr8PMgSJIDPfZNEihglja UbiSmuY4i6glGwd4BrDkSAFe85AfcvxEiQLjGZSfQ8njqtlV5xdXtrfGUJziKyG1mI0z N+DOU2gpaBJvtRbIW+ulglN0qmHX1mSNvGq5x64StTVYNuC5b1WdtsQSygq+md5IGsYi 5ek/DtT3BIKZJNh6DQYMl/6wgvq4d0rt5pzXKOGZI//7Rb7Yaws6E4uU+vuTMVWpKDTg r1WQ1hW8YwBMkptHzzEEJAH0LNrRM6ozrtnXL2kVRVdgyFCgPPKADv17zbfDbNBZlbKU lcpQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dSHP4VBqMNc7QAgjKaofnuJCXqVz2GvTTF9mTU1+ipI=; b=cH1HoswW7JnV3MEJBNMdE37yCZohh8bBrxKylcenx5AzKGsGwPrlWnk2fQWIIYhYd/ DKeMMAr7vPon9HpB4R/i+Lm2mITK4UepyltOZ/Haac3E3nnMEH2acCG2lVtsFLWtua2a wYKEHSvj6jvg8Rrw54x+F707ygFdG4EvgTzU7BBKGcc/Xv50EOgEoJnfBtaCwOwZmZVI vtQPlJQvKbIr8emlCQnOVzZZSTNYzUFOZeNPkkckDtNidd4oFU+Ajd3KK6pNq5F3U8C9 +RHVcmjQoBkREdVKoHHEFD7C0kdAZexELJRJZxAmsRsA0LkNrPRz1/DECeBIpUvwfSR7 zKeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530X8oY+IthStd8B/Zh52geghY3sk5i8/bDQTH0pQq+qvevO3ZlG UXBuEpQA1A1hDrXdn/3RYvvqCMZgHn8vrjpriYF5zKwV6AM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/xu5Rn3X69q6y4Dgyw4vLNcLDWZncpdHMXy0IW0hTfTbJDxWpWTIDMpRnrcK1gtsrOd5lW1tZnjm+GL7+8s4=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5f56:: with SMTP id 22mr2944413lfz.35.1614377460151; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:11:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5F5C0A34-DD09-4622-8828-6D3625703B06@apple.com> <CA+RyBmWOSH0ZdsCzNM=dTmh_kwz8kcFCbC9xCZT01ZN9yyoEnA@mail.gmail.com> <E421E2D5-2021-4A28-BFD5-F695780A3AE9@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <E421E2D5-2021-4A28-BFD5-F695780A3AE9@apple.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:10:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVO1R=koJ7_x+NPQiQVUh5dY=tL3WPDGOaZKyvZmfJLzA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Cc: "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000bb95005bc448bee"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/x4V41_cjJCI0fYCAupSKRuOlVhk>
Subject: Re: [ippm] IETF 110 Draft Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 22:11:04 -0000

Hi Tommy,
many thanks.

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 1:52 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
> I’ve removed STAMP YANG, and added the two other talks you’ve requested.
>
> Updated agenda here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/agenda-110-ippm-01
>
> Best,
> Tommy
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Tommy and Ian,
> following comments we've received on draft-li-ippm-pm-on-lag, the authors
> separated O/TWAMP and STAMP solutions. Also, the STAMP solution is solely
> TLV-based without updating the STAMP base packet. We would greatly
> appreciate an opportunity to present updates in one presentation,
> preferably during the Friday session:
>
> draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag; draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag        Presenter:
> Greg Mirsky (tentatively)          Time: 10 min.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:53 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
> 40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello IPPM,
>>
>> I’ve just posted our draft agenda for IETF 110:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/agenda-110-ippm-00
>>
>> This time, we’ll have two separate sessions. The first session on Monday
>> will be focused on trying to close out some discussions and make decisions
>> for various IOAM documents. The second session on Friday will focus on the
>> other working group documents, proposed work, and lightning talks. We do
>> have additional lightning talk slots available, so please email the chairs
>> if you are interested.
>>
>> Best,
>> Tommy & Ian
>> _______________________________________________
>> ippm mailing list
>> ippm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>>
>
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status