[ippm] Re: Working group last call for Quality of Outcome (draft-ietf-ippm-qoo)

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Marcus, Authors, et al.,
I read the draft and support its progress to publication. I have several
notes and will appreciate your consideration:

   - In the Introduction. When stressing composability of the Quality
   Attenuation, consider adding an informational reference to, for example, RFC
   6049 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6049>. (Yes, there's a reference
   in Section 2.2 Requirements)
   -  "Accuracy" and "precision" are used in the document extensively,
   sometimes even in the same sentence. In general, accuracy can be
   interpreted as precision. Do you use a different interpretation in the
   document? If that is the case, providing that in the document will help a
   reader. Otherwise, consider adding a note that "accuracy" and "precision"
   are used in the text interchangeably and avoid "accuracy and precision" by
   removing one.
   - Furthermore, an explanation of what value is considered as the Ground
   Truth and is being reflected with some accuracy/precision by measurements,
   would be helpful to a reader.
   - A nit. I think that we use "Quality Attenuation" as a term. In that
   case, it must be uppercased throughout the document.
   - I don't think that applications or protocols act on their own will:

Applications and the underlying networking protocols make separate
optimizations ...


   - In the Introduction s/allow for/allows for/
   - In the Motivation s/i unattainable/is unattainable/
   - In Requirements, consider s/applications will work well/an application
   will work well/
   - I wonder what is the significance of using '*' in the enumerated list?

Regards,
Greg



On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 6:42 AM Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hello IPPM,
>
>
>
> This email initiates the working group last call for Quality of Outcome
> (draft-ietf-ippm-qoo).
>
>
>
> The current version of the document can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-qoo/
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-qoo-03.html
>
>
>
> Please review the document and reply to this email with any comments and
> indicate whether you believe it is ready for publication.
>
> This WGLC will last for three weeks and end on *Thursday* *July 3, 2025*.
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Marcus and Thomas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>