[ippm] [Errata Verified] RFC8972 (8199)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 04 December 2024 18:59 UTC

To: hawkinsw@obs.cr, gregimirsky@gmail.com, xiao.min2@zte.com.cn, hnydell@accedian.com, footer.foote@nokia.com, adi@apple.com, eruffini@outsys.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20241204185956.2F52D1BE972@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 10:59:56 -0800
Message-ID-Hash: UHDJNRRYT4OFHTDMDE4R3Y3U6SGQQ4PM
CC: iesg@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Precedence: list
Subject: [ippm] [Errata Verified] RFC8972 (8199)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/y3AL11cqnstfoxPuma-t72iAfOY>

The following errata report has been verified for RFC8972,
"Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol Optional Extensions".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8199

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: William Hawkins <hawkinsw@obs.cr>
Date Reported: 2024-12-04
Verified by: Warren Kumari (Ops AD) (IESG)

Section: 4.4

Original Text
-------------
Also, the Session-Reflector MUST copy the value of the DSCP and ECN
fields of the IP header of the received STAMP test packet into the
DSCP2 field in the reflected test packet.

Corrected Text
--------------
Also, the Session-Reflector MUST copy the value of the DSCP and ECN
fields of the IP header of the received STAMP test packet into the
DSCP2 and ECN fields, respectively, in the reflected test packet.

Notes
-----
First, thank you to all the IETF contributors who do such amazing work to keep the Internet going (seriously!). I noticed this minor omission while implementing the specification. I spoke with Mr. Mirsky (one of the authors) who suggested I file this report. Of course, the authors' intent is not in doubt, but he suggested that I submit this report nonetheless. Besides this very minor misstatement, as someone writing an implementation who was completely uninvolved in drafting the RFC, I have found this document to be incredibly readable and easy to follow -- thank you!

[Edit: WK (Ops AD): Thanks for the Errata (and the kind note) ].

--------------------------------------
RFC8972 (draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-10)
--------------------------------------
Title : Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol Optional Extensions
Publication Date : January 2021
Author(s) : G. Mirsky, X. Min, H. Nydell, R. Foote, A. Masputra, E. Ruffini
Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source : IP Performance Measurement
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG

[ippm] [Errata Verified] RFC8972 (8199) RFC Errata System