Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4020A1A6FFE
 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 05:56:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.787
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.787 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id HsUD_TgTYDBo for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Sun, 29 Nov 2015 05:56:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from trammell.ch (trammell.ch [5.148.172.66])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA381A6F99
 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 05:56:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nb-10604.ethz.ch (nb-10604.ethz.ch [82.130.102.91])
 by trammell.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D71091A03E5
 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:55:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_64B71FEE-B3E8-403F-8B5B-74473F58F515";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:55:48 +0100
References: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D0F2B258821@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
To: ippm@ietf.org
Message-Id: <AE4CF7A1-CE8B-440C-A487-F6CEC590724B@trammell.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/yk2kTHRJU5dxoNsmQlsEdfPN0cQ>
Subject: [ippm] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_New_Liaison_Statement=2C_=22LS_-_Reply_to?=
 =?utf-8?q?_ITU-T_SG11_relevant_activities_on_=E2=80=9CInternet_Speed_Meas?=
 =?utf-8?q?urements=E2=80=9D_=28reply_to_SG11-LS91=29_=22?=
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>,
 <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>,
 <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 13:56:21 -0000


--Apple-Mail=_64B71FEE-B3E8-403F-8B5B-74473F58F515
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_7C370C33-5EC0-47CA-89EF-E9457F4BAD07"


--Apple-Mail=_7C370C33-5EC0-47CA-89EF-E9457F4BAD07
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

Greetings, IPPM WG,

Please find attached a draft reply to the liaison from ITU-T SG12 of =
last week, graciously written by Al Morton, underscoring the WG's work =
on fixing issues with using TCP to measure TCP throughput =
(model-based-metrics).

We intend to send this soon; please post any comments to the list.

Cheers,

Brian (as IPPM co-chair)


--Apple-Mail=_7C370C33-5EC0-47CA-89EF-E9457F4BAD07
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=Liaison_Reply.txt
Content-Type: text/plain;
	name="Liaison_Reply.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Following reception of:=0D
>>> Title: LS - Reply to ITU-T SG11 relevant activities on =E2=80=9CIntern=
et =0D
>>> Speed Measurements=E2=80=9D (reply to SG11-LS91) Submission Date: =
2015-11-24 =0D
>>> URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1444/=0D=

=0D
(Proposed) Liaison Reply to ITU-T SG 12, SG 11, and TSAG=0D
=0D
The IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) working group of the IETF=0D
appreciates the opportunity to comment on methods intending=0D
to measure Internet Speed, such as those described in the =0D
attachments to your liaison (originating in SG 11).  This is=0D
one of the topics which IPPM was chartered to address, and it=0D
has proven more difficult than originally thought.=0D
=0D
The cited proposals for International Recommendations =0D
depend on the assumption that TCP-based measurements can meet=0D
requirements for standardized metrics, in terms of applicability=0D
to subpaths as well as end-to-end paths, and repeatability=0D
across independent implementations or measurement systems. =0D
IPPM's current work in progress (see reference below) =0D
describes why a TCP-based approach would be unsuccessful,=0D
due to the properties of TCP's control loop (see sections 4.0=0D
and 4.1 of the reference below for many more details).=0D
IPPM is currently pursuing methods of measurement which avoid=0D
TCP's control loop, and retain the ability to measure subpaths=0D
and complete paths in a repeatable way. =0D
=0D
IPPM urges all members of the measurement and testing community=0D
to carefully consider our findings and experience with =0D
capacity measurement, and to join our work in IETF to specify =0D
methods of measurement that avoid the pitfalls of TCP-based=0D
testing. =0D
=0D
Referenced Work-in-progress:=0D
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-07=0D
Specific sections cited above:=0D
=
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-07#section=
-4=0D

--Apple-Mail=_7C370C33-5EC0-47CA-89EF-E9457F4BAD07
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii




--Apple-Mail=_7C370C33-5EC0-47CA-89EF-E9457F4BAD07--

--Apple-Mail=_64B71FEE-B3E8-403F-8B5B-74473F58F515
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=6cAz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_64B71FEE-B3E8-403F-8B5B-74473F58F515--

