[ippm] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-01.txt

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Mon, 20 May 2024 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0961C151534 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2024 09:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fpngrLIc88BQ for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2024 09:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb30.google.com (mail-yb1-xb30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB73C15152C for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2024 09:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb30.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-deb654482bcso2750317276.1 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2024 09:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1716221690; x=1716826490; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rR/6omVFy0mXlP3DSfj2kniFldScuEZwvlR0VYYzH54=; b=lJ4+GHQfL9N9D6fH5I+8ERBq05DruLXiSplszbYBYnRy3QrZ/ADpKe6pIPcIUtCtpX ENXEHYd4zp/L1V6Jaljm0pH5gvMiGLuLsRhVCpvbsrQiEC5QiH7AnkaOya+o6vcC0SZg Izyi0q0Egg3vsQatjcSoaLWGGG/vPgVK2QJLE55k1KAShrUNu6pydERUtM711OsZBoH4 wQeNX6VmAuT3pzoqYeN2DoZaA4O7MALxRbu16vtvcHEkUZ7Xy6l/MlG4zpzTJfyL7DcN w/+2Oe54fxGcdJAQJSb37oYyMviozb2NSp41IUohxZB+XzC11ynpJLx+Q13+g2cOoER8 Iq7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716221690; x=1716826490; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rR/6omVFy0mXlP3DSfj2kniFldScuEZwvlR0VYYzH54=; b=X+GZ31yRZsJlTv6kqgctI/Su/sSg0nBsdgWz9Xmwv8Dlc2SMeXWCO6tG9hYQfSOe1/ 37u3vC9EcBOJAiUo5NWo80/uW4LXaucB7fIW9HDpGcllg7yL3EKuqi7iK7ABJKgfj9qy U+tZrLoCjFyvCUqspaX/21w/OF5z72LIWBytTPLIrHoBaxAyYMv4R8sXWirzFoF1gbmI yelsT8duelQs62/cx63wuDJKSQeasKW9O1X75uy3HyLSqJnzsyGa5tTg+QNSyaZ1vjlL QPhZXoA2kY9ErxIfyYwmyAwE7mpNZeLx/4MWUak+qwTRagoMBWVsUnYP5Z/CTJj1DUZl /0Bw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwdqnqIMcYwxmwuKgrWaWcF34hdlMj6SOYAPY+CwHzrmQNuTfOt 22jAkRJUuZ8H9p/8RFO3T5RLtrOnJ5+whrriA+HJFu9bc4VgqH1aU//tlSeZ17g/THzdHFGmog6 d/64N/DRJ0z9Z9ZgR7QpVt+vWwVHaXw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEDzr2qIKnfw0ANFEvhiGyYfgmKWuqM8hDQNuC7M9wItgHNrWlrlq/8pxaE3kDlom0EALivRPs8GHPpP/u7cVQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:1344:b0:de4:6ef8:2778 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-dee4f2e832fmr28580985276.29.1716221690293; Mon, 20 May 2024 09:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <171622118322.54655.12844508176589302826@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <171622118322.54655.12844508176589302826@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 09:14:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVucGq_vH5CY85F6AaRiF9afE-ekP6c-OaVRbM993PsjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000034ba040618e50044"
Message-ID-Hash: CPLUO4WAOCWBC3GIZD6XQWSYUMZ4RGLC
X-Message-ID-Hash: CPLUO4WAOCWBC3GIZD6XQWSYUMZ4RGLC
X-MailFrom: gregimirsky@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ippm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [ippm] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-01.txt
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/z7VxfSvvL891Z1dK0UPLhNUwE_M>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ippm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ippm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ippm-leave@ietf.org>

Dear All,
this version addresses comments received in the course of the WG AP. Thank
you, Tal.
Please share your questions, comments, and suggestions. all are always
welcome and greatly appreciated.

Regards,
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, May 20, 2024 at 9:08 AM
Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-01.txt
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: <ippm@ietf.org>


Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-01.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the IP Performance Measurement (IPPM) WG of the IETF.

   Title:   Performance Measurement with Asymmetrical Packets in STAMP
   Authors: Greg Mirsky
            Ernesto Ruffini
            Henrik Nydell
            Richard Foote
   Name:    draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-01.txt
   Pages:   11
   Dates:   2024-05-20

Abstract:

   This document describes an optional extension to a Simple Two-way
   Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) that enables the use of STAMP
   test and reflected packets of variable length during a single STAMP
   test session.  In some use cases, the use of asymmetrical test
   packets allow for the creation of more realistic flows of test
   packets and, thus, a closer approximation between active performance
   measurements and conditions experienced by the monitored application.

   Also, the document includes an analysis of challenges related to
   performance monitoring in a multicast network.  It defines procedures
   and STAMP extensions to achieve more efficient measurements with a
   lesser impact on a network.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-01.html

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-01

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list -- ippm@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ippm-leave@ietf.org